ArticleBlood advances2026
Molecular risk markers define risk of relapse in myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome beyond measurable residual disease.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02521493 (Risk-Stratified Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Down Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Risk-Stratified Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Down Syndrome
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of down syndrome-related myeloid leukemia in Turkiye: a multicenter retrospective observational cohort study by the Turkish Pediatric Hematology Association.Annals of hematology · 2026Observational
- The effect of cohesin mutations on HLA-class II expression in the myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Toward therapeutic development for ML-DS.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Association between hematopoietic recovery indicators and minimal residual disease after induction therapy in newly diagnosed pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractMyeloid leukemia of Down syndrome (ML-DS) is a distinct form of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that responds to reduced-intensity chemotherapy, as compared with non-DS AML that requires intensive chemotherapy and often stem cell transplant. While most patients with ML-DS have a favorable prognosis, outcomes for those with refractory or relapsed disease are dismal. Children's Oncology Group study AAML1531 introduced the use of measurable residual disease by multiparameter flow cytometry at the end of the first course of induction therapy (EOI-1 MRD) for risk stratification of treatment intensity. Of 280 patients with ML-DS who were enrolled, 41 were classified as high risk (HR) due to positive EOI-1 MRD, and treated with intensified chemotherapy similar to that used for pediatric non-DS AML. Treatment intensification did not improve the 2-year event-free survival compared with patients who were MRD-positive treated with reduced-intensity therapy in the predecessor study AAML0431 (80.5% ± 12.4% vs 76%; P = .247) or overall survival (80.5% ± 12.4% vs 76.2% ± 18.6%; P = .819), but significantly increased the frequency of febrile neutropenia and sepsis events. While stratification of treatment intensity based on MRD was not beneficial, molecular markers of relapse risk proposed by the Japan Children's Cancer Group for ML-DS (alterations of CDKN2A, ZBTB7A, JAK2, TP53) proved prognostic. Relapse risk was 50% in patients who were HR from AAML1531 with any high-risk molecular marker compared with 6.7% in those without. Similar relapse results were obtained in the MRD-negative AAML1531 group, suggesting molecular risk markers can predict outcome and thus be used to stratify therapy in ML-DS. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02521493.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.