ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2025
Evaluation of Density Functionals for Si-O-C-H Molecule Thermochemistry.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The energies and vibrational frequencies of molecular species with Si-O-C-H compositions have been calculated at the CCSD(T) level (coupled cluster with single and double excitations and a perturbative treatment of triple excitations). The CCSD(T) results compare well with experimental data where the difference in enthalpy of formation is typically only about 1-2 kJ/mol in most cases. In addition, the same molecules have been calculated with density functional theory (DFT) calculations using nine commonly used density functionals and two different basis sets. The performance of the DFT calculations is compared with the CCSD(T) benchmark values in terms of enthalpy of formation, reaction energy, vibrational frequencies, and zero-point energies. The results show that the M06-2X functional provides the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) in terms of the enthalpy of formation, whereas, for the vibrational frequencies and zero-point energies, the SCAN functional gives the lowest MAE values. The results were also grouped according to the types of bonds that are present in the molecules. Moreover, an elaborate set of possible reactions within the molecular species in the Si-O-C-H system is included to evaluate the performance of the different DFT functionals with respect to the relative stability of species within the same reaction system. In this case, the B2GP-PLYP functional shows the smallest errors. PW6B95 is the functional that most consistently performs well for the studied properties of the included molecules. The coupled cluster data sets provide new benchmark data, several of which are not previously available for silicon chemistry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.