Trial reportJMIR aging2025
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Digital Social Robots in Reducing Loneliness Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Japan: Randomized Controlled Trial and Qualitative Analysis.
Trial report in JMIR aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clin-STAR Corner: Practice Changing Advances at the Interface of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning and Geriatrics.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Review
- The Influence of Robot Facial Expression and Inclusion Behavior on Rapport and Trust in Older Adults: Mixed-Factorial Experimental Study.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- Addressing the silent epidemic: a narrative review and evidence synthesis of digital health and telehealth interventions for loneliness in older adults.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2026Review
- Empowerment or Exposure? Digital Literacy and the Vulnerabilities of Trust in Strangers Among Older Adults: Evidence from China.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating a Social Robot Reception Service in an Italian Geriatric Hospital (HOSPER Study): Protocol for a Usability Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Reframing Person-Centered Fundamental Care in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Posthumanization: A Theory-Informed Narrative Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Most studies on interventions using social robots to reduce loneliness have been conducted in facilities in Western countries. Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of digital social robot interventions in reducing loneliness among community-dwelling older Japanese adults using a randomized controlled trial and qualitative analysis. Methods: Individuals aged ≥65 years who lived alone in Tokyo and neighboring areas and experienced loneliness were recruited. In total, 73 eligible participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention or a control group. The 4-week intervention involved a humanoid social communication robot (BOCCO emo), which facilitated conversations with human operators and family members and reminded participants of daily tasks. The primary outcome was loneliness, with mental health (psychological well-being, depression, and self-rated health), the frequency of laughter in daily life, health competence, and interpersonal relationships (social network and generalized trust) as secondary outcomes. Participants were evaluated at baseline and follow-up using a self-administered questionnaire. In the follow-up survey, participants in the intervention group provided open-ended responses regarding their experiences using the social robot. Results: In total, 68 participants completed both the baseline and follow-up surveys (34 in each group). The average age of the participants was 82.3 (SD 6.5) years, and 64 (N=68, 94%) participants were women. A linear mixed-effects model with a random intercept indicated that loneliness decreased more in the intervention group than in the control group (difference-in-difference -3.1, 95% CI -5.9 to -0.4). Psychological well-being also improved in the intervention group (difference-in-difference 1.9, 95% CI 0.1 to 3.7). We identified 4 categories through content analysis: emotional support and psychological connection, lifestyle assistance, enrichment of social interaction, and cognitive and mental stimulation. Conclusions: Social robots can reduce loneliness among community-dwelling older adults in non-Western societies. Information and communication technology appears to be an effective approach for alleviating loneliness and enhancing well-being among older adults in community settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.