ArticleHealth promotion international2025
Approaches to assessment of community level health literacy: a scoping review.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Theory-Based Adolescent Health Literacy Intervention: A Case of Nepal.Health literacy research and practice · 2026Article
- Developing and Evaluating a Health Literacy Training Model for Volunteer Elderly Caregivers to Prevent and Control NCDs in Thailand: An Action Research Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Digital health equity among older adult(s): a conceptual analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Addressing health literacy at the community level can provide the potential for improving health knowledge, skills, and behaviours that can ultimately lead to better health outcomes. While many tools exist for measuring individual and disease-specific health literacy, community and critical health literacy have received less attention. The review focuses on geographic communities and includes the concepts of 'health literacy', 'critical health literacy', and 'assessment'. Key information sources for the review were Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC, and PsycINFO, along with Google Scholar for grey literature. Hand searches of reference lists from included studies were also conducted. The search was limited to articles published between 1 January 2010, and 1 June 2023, with no restrictions on data collection methods or study design. Data were charted following guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA ScR. Initially, 14 216 citations were retrieved, with 8612 remaining after removing duplicates. Double-blind screening of titles and abstracts resulted in 33 articles, which underwent double-blind full-text screening. Three articles were included, and a hand search identified one more, totalling four articles. The small number of eligible articles and the heterogeneity of content reflect the nascent stage of development of community level health literacy and its assessment. The review findings highlight the need to develop tools to assess community level health literacy to support interventions in empowering communities in maintaining and promoting their own health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.