ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2025
Optimizing outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: the role of patellar resurfacing and tibial ınsert type.
Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTotal knee arthroplasty is a common procedure for advanced knee osteoarthritis, aiming to reduce pain and restore function. However, the impact of patellar resurfacing and tibial insert types (fixed vs. mobile) on clinical outcomes remains debated, with limited comparative studies.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included total knee arthroplasty patients (2012-2018) with ≥5 years of follow-up, divided into four groups based on insert type and resurfacing status. Clinical outcomes were assessed using visual analog scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, timed up and go, and range of motion. Shapiro-Wilk tests were used to assess normality, and group comparisons were conducted using non-parametric statistical methods.
resultsNon-resurfacing groups had significantly higher pain scores (p<0.001). Mobile inserts provided better flexion range of motion and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index functional scores than fixed inserts (p<0.001). The best functional outcomes were observed in the mobile insert with the resurfacing group. A significant correlation was found between timed up and go and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index total scores in the fixed insert without resurfacing group (r=0.424, p=0.008), while no such correlation was observed in other groups.
conclusionPatellar resurfacing and mobile tibial inserts enhance pain relief, mobility, and function in total knee arthroplasty patients. However, due to the retrospective nature of the study and group heterogeneity, prospective multicenter trials are warranted to validate these findings. These findings emphasize the importance of individualized implant selection, warranting further prospective, multicenter studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.