Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41124529›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria2025

Candidate antigens for serological testing (ELISA) and diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis.

Maria Gabriela Sampaio Lira, Ranielly Araujo Nogueira, Renata Mondêgo-Oliveira, Allana Freitas Barros, Higor da Silva Ferreira, Carla Janaina Rebouças Marques do Rosário, Fábio Henrique Evangelista de Andrade, Flávia Raquel Fernandes do Nascimento, David Soeiro Barbosa, Eduardo Martins de Sousa and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maria Gabriela Sampaio LiraUniversidade Federal do Maranhão - UFMA, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, São Luís, MA, Brasil.
Ranielly Araujo NogueiraUniversidade Federal do Maranhão - UFMA, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, São Luís, MA, Brasil.
Renata Mondêgo-OliveiraUniversidade Estadual do Maranhão - UEMA, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência Animal, São Luís, MA, Brasil.
Allana Freitas BarrosUniversidade Estadual do Maranhão - UEMA, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência Animal, São Luís, MA, Brasil.
Higor da Silva FerreiraUniversidade Estadual do Maranhão - UEMA, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência Animal, São Luís, MA, Brasil.
Carla Janaina Rebouças Marques do RosárioUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Programa de Pós-graduação em Parasitologia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Fábio Henrique Evangelista de AndradeUniversidade Estadual do Maranhão - UEMA, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Curso de Medicina Veterinária, Laboratório de Anatomopatologia, São Luís, MA, Brasil.
Flávia Raquel Fernandes do NascimentoUniversidade Federal do Maranhão - UFMA, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, São Luís, MA, Brasil.
David Soeiro BarbosaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Programa de Pós-graduação em Parasitologia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Eduardo Martins de SousaUniversidade Federal do Maranhão - UFMA, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, São Luís, MA, Brasil.
Ana Lucia Abreu-SilvaUniversidade Federal do Maranhão - UFMA, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, São Luís, MA, Brasil.
Rafael Cardoso CarvalhoUniversidade Federal do Maranhão - UFMA, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, São Luís, MA, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7073-8308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) relies on parasitological, molecular methods and serological. However, there are difficulties in using these methods to monitor the disease, and there is a need for more efficient diagnostic alternatives for dogs with suspected visceral leishmaniasis, also using clinical aspects of the animals, which that can be useful for surveillance and control. This study aimed to evaluate the serological diagnostic potential of recombinant antigens in order to improve CVL diagnosis. Disease diagnosis, clinical evaluation, and collection of biological samples for laboratory analysis were performed on dogs from the Tirirical District in São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil. The animals were divided into four groups: clinically suspected dogs for visceral leishmaniasis (VL), subclinical dogs for VL, animals with infections, and healthy animals from an endemic area. Subsequently, the animals were tested for the soluble liver antigen (SLA) antigen and recombinant Leishmania infantum chagasi antigens rP2a, rP2b, rP0, rHSP70, rHSP83, rH2A, and rKMP-11 using ELISA. The results demonstrate that the recombinant antigens that presented the best sensitivity, specificity, and high or moderate accuracy according to the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were rP2a, rP2b, and rH2A. These results indicate that rP2a, rP2b, and rH2A proteins are candidates for improving the diagnosis of CVL.

Indexed as

Antigens, ProtozoanDog DiseasesLeishmania infantumLeishmaniasis, VisceralAnimalsDogsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssaySerologic TestsAntigens, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID41124529
PMCPMC12643239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.