ArticleRevista de saude publica2025
Inequalities in the care for Labor and Delivery in Rio de Janeiro - Birth in Brazil Research II: national survey on abortion, delivery, and birth.
Article in Revista de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of spinning babiesBMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Companion and Type of Delivery: Inequalities in Brazil Revealed by the National Health Survey - 2019.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the care for labor and delivery in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, according to hospital location and type of funding for delivery, and to verify the social, geographic, and care factors associated with going into labor and having a vaginal delivery.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional hospital-based study ("Birth in Brazil Research II: national survey on abortion, delivery, and birth") conducted in 29 hospitals located in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Women with live births and/or stillbirths with gestational age ≥ 22 weeks or ≥ 500 g weight were eligible, totaling 1,762 women. Interviews were conducted in the hospitals, in the immediate postpartum period. Data were extracted from the prenatal card and maternal medical records. Multiple logistic regression was performed for labor and delivery, using a hierarchical model, with estimated odds ratios and specific confidence intervals.
resultsThe frequency of going into labor was 54% and of vaginal delivery, 41.0%. The following aspects were associated with going into labor: provision of care in hospitals located in the municipality of Rio de Janeiro, with public source of funding, being nulliparous or multiparous with previous delivery, preferring vaginal delivery at the end of pregnancy, not being obese and without complications during pregnancy. For vaginal delivery, we observed an association with low level of education, having no partner, being nulliparous or multiparous with previous delivery, having access to good practices as for going into labor and delivery, and use of analgesia during labor, regardless of the type of funding and hospital location.
conclusionsWe observed advances in labor care in the state of Rio de Janeiro, although the frequency of labor and vaginal delivery is still low, as well as good practices, but with better results for the municipality of Rio de Janeiro. All good practices were associated with vaginal delivery, especially the use of analgesia and the presence of doulas. Vaginal delivery was more frequent in socially vulnerable women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.