Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41124301›Full record

ArticleClinical rehabilitation2026

Emma Swift, Mary R O'Brien, Sarah Peters, Carol Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma SwiftSchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5380-7308
Mary R O'BrienFaculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8509-3650
Sarah PetersManchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1949-3995
Carol KellyFaculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9927-1382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveTo identify healthcare professionals' perceptions of pulmonary rehabilitation as a management strategy for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).DesignA qualitative interview study which adopted an interpretive phenomenological approach.MethodsTwenty-seven healthcare professionals were recruited from general practices in the North West of England and two hospital trusts, consisting of: general practitioners, practice nurses, and doctors and nurses working on general medical wards. Audio recorded semi-structured interviews investigated healthcare professionals' perceptions and knowledge of pulmonary rehabilitation; interpretive phenomenological analysis was conducted on the transcribed interviews.ResultsThree themes were identified:

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdultEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationCOPDeducationexerciseHealthcare professionalpsychologypulmonary rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41124301
PMCPMC12722578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.