Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41124231›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The impact of changing forest composition in Europe - longest carbon turnover time in unmanaged and broadleaved deciduous forests.

Anna Ferretto, Peter Anthoni, Thomas A M Pugh, Konstantin Gregor, Martin Thurner, Carolina Natel, David Wårlind, Mats Lindeskog, Almut Arneth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anna FerrettoKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research, Garmisch Partenkirchen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4865-3660
Peter AnthoniKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research, Garmisch Partenkirchen, Germany.
Thomas A M PughLund University, Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund, Sweden.
Konstantin GregorTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Life Sciences, Freising, Germany.
Martin ThurnerKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research, Garmisch Partenkirchen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2362-5161
Carolina NatelKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research, Garmisch Partenkirchen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3103-6789
David WårlindLund University, Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund, Sweden.
Mats LindeskogLund University, Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund, Sweden.
Almut ArnethKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research, Garmisch Partenkirchen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forests play a crucial role in Europe's strategy for achieving carbon neutrality. Carbon turnover time - the time that carbon spends in the ecosystem - is a fundamental component in determining forest potential to mitigate climate change. However, there is a significant knowledge gap regarding how current and future forest management practices will affect carbon turnover time. This study aims to compare the effects of various forest management strategies on carbon turnover time in European forests. To achieve this, we used the dynamic global vegetation model LPJ-GUESS to simulate carbon pools and fluxes under stylised forest management scenarios mainly based on changing species composition. We calculated carbon turnover times under two conditions: first, with constant climate and CO2 concentration to assess the isolated impact of forest management; second, under a climate change scenario (SSP3-RCP7.0) to evaluate the combined effects of forest management and climate change. Our results indicate that unmanaged forests and the transition to broadleaved deciduous forests have a similar ecosystem carbon turnover time, which is the longest among all the management options across all the European climatic zones. Climate change decreases ecosystem carbon turnover time in any forest management, in a similar way, especially in cold climates. This study is the first step to include forest management when modelling carbon turnover time and indicates how the shift towards broadleaved forests, which is seen as an important climate-change adaptation strategy in many European regions, can also provide co-benefits for climate-change mitigation.

Indexed as

CarbonForestsTreesCarbon CycleCarbon DioxideClimate ChangeEcosystemEuropeCarbonCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID41124231
PMCPMC12543152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.