ArticlePloS one2025
Enhancing automated robotic services efficiency through intelligent dependent robotic computation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research focuses on enhancing the adaptability and efficacy of service robots in real-time, multi-scenario environments where diverse settings complicate the interpretation of user commands and dynamic environmental fluctuations. It introduces the Commuting Input Valuation Approach (CIVA), which combines transfer learning with a flexible state transfer system to improve robot response rates, minimize unnecessary actions, and enhance learning efficiency across varied environments. The main contributions are (i) a continuous training framework for robots, (ii) a method for sharing information between response and learning stages, (iii) transfer learning approaches suited for both short and long inputs, and (iv) an adaptive reaction rate calculation that accounts for real-time conditions. CIVA was evaluated on 32 interactive tasks using the Daily Interactive Robot Manipulation (DIM) dataset, containing 1,603 dependent and 1,751 independent commands. Performance was assessed relative to baseline robotic models utilizing criteria including task completion duration, input interpreting failure rate, command-to-action efficiency, reaction successful rate, and learning velocity. In a targeted screw-loosening assessment comprising 120 input commands over 70 seconds, CIVA demonstrated a 35% reduction in task completion duration, a 42% decline in interpretation errors, a 28% enhancement in instruction-to-action efficiency, a 45% augmentation in response success rate, and a 50% increase in learning velocity relative to baseline measurements. The findings indicate that CIVA can enhance human-robot interaction and task performance; nevertheless, additional validation is necessary to verify reproducibility and generalization across diverse real-world contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.