Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41124172›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Work together, move together-Cooperation and rapport promote interpersonal synchrony.

Clara Scheer, Daniel L Bowling, Niklas A Hungerländer, W Tecumseh Fitch, Lisa Horn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clara ScheerDepartment of Cognitive Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8739-991X
Daniel L BowlingDepartment of Cognitive Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Niklas A HungerländerDepartment of Cognitive Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
W Tecumseh FitchDepartment of Cognitive Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lisa HornDepartment of Cognitive Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9586-915X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human movement synchrony is one fundamental driving force for social bonding and yet not all individuals are equally likely to engage in interpersonal synchrony. Movement synchrony increases collaboration and feelings of rapport, but it remains unclear whether cooperative interactions between two individuals also result in greater interpersonal synchrony. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether cooperating in one task increased spontaneous movement synchrony in a subsequent unrelated task. Thirty-four same-gender dyads first worked on a jigsaw puzzle - either collaboratively or individually - and subsequently jumped on trampolines facing each other. Additionally, we investigated the potential effects of the participants' rapport and mood during the experiment. As predicted, dyads who had worked on the puzzle collaboratively displayed greater movement synchrony when later jumping on trampolines than dyads who had worked individually. When we tested for the additional influence of the participants' initial rapport and mood, however, the effect of the collaborative treatment was qualified by a stronger effect of initial rapport. The results of the current study provide evidence that collaborative interactions and initial rapport are important stepping stones towards interpersonal synchrony and add to the growing body of evidence suggesting that human cooperation and interpersonal synchrony are essentially connected.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterpersonal RelationsAdultAffectFemaleHumansMaleMovementYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41124172
PMCPMC12543173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.