ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Heterogeneous effects of physical activity on physiological stress during pregnancy.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physical activity buffers physiological stress during high emotional distress: a wearable-derived prospective cohort study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Cross-Generational Integration of Exercise and Nutritional Encoding in Offspring Adipose Genomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Association between objectively measured physical activity and maternal stool microbiota during pregnancy: results from a preliminary investigation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pregnancy involves rapid physiological and psychological changes that can increase vulnerability to health complications, underscoring the need for timely, individualized support. Mobile health (mHealth) tools offer a scalable way to capture repeated measures of health status throughout pregnancy, facilitating longitudinal assessment and the opportunity for timely intervention. This study leveraged mHealth technologies, including the Oura smart ring and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) via a mobile app, to examine how emotional distress affects the relationship between physical activity (PA) and heart rate variability (HRV), an indicator of physiological stress during pregnancy. Specifically, we examined whether emotional distress, measured via daily EMA surveys, moderates the association between physical activity and nighttime HRV, captured by continuous Oura ring data. Hence, this analysis integrated temporally aligned wearable and self-report data to investigate the interaction between subjective emotional states and objectively measured physical activity patterns. Consenting participants, aged 18-40 years, with a healthy singleton pregnancy in the second trimester, were enrolled in the study. Our findings revealed that on days with high emotional distress, each additional 1,000 steps was associated with a 3.5% increase in nighttime HRV (p-value < 0.001; 95% CI: 2.6%, 4.4%). In contrast, physical activity had little to no association with HRV on days with moderate distress (0.6%; 95% CI: -0.7%, 1.9%) and low distress (0.6%; 95% CI: -0.4%, 1.5%). These findings suggest that physical activity may be particularly beneficial on high-distress days, supporting the development of adaptive interventions that prioritize PA engagement during periods of elevated emotional distress. Based on our model-estimated moderation effects, we may recommend that a pregnant woman increase her physical activity on high-distress days due to a strong positive PA-HRV association, whereas for those who do not experience much emotional distress, the recommendation may be less emphasized, given the weaker observed association.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.