ArticlePloS one2025
Analysis of intracellular and intercellular crosstalk from omics data.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disease phenotypes can be described as the consequence of interactions among molecular processes that are altered beyond resilience. Here, we address the challenge of assessing the possible alteration of intra- and inter-cellular molecular interactions among processes or cells. We present an approach, designated as "Ulisse", which complements the existing methods in the domains of enrichment analysis, pathway crosstalk analysis and cell-cell communication analysis. It applies to gene lists that contain quantitative information about gene-related alterations, typically derived in the context of omics or multi-omics studies. Ulisse highlights the presence of alterations in those components that control the interactions between processes or cells. Considering the complexity of statistical assessment of network-based analyses, crosstalk quantification is supported by two distinct null models, which systematically sample alternative configurations of gene-related changes and gene-gene interactions. Further, the approach provides an additional way of identifying the genes associated with the phenotype. As a proof-of-concept, we applied Ulisse to study the alteration of pathway crosstalks and cell-cell communications in triple negative breast cancer samples, based on single-cell RNA sequencing. In conclusion, our work supports the usefulness of crosstalk analysis as an additional instrument in the "toolkit" of biomedical research for translating complex biological data into actionable insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.