Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41124151›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Analysis of intracellular and intercellular crosstalk from omics data.

Alice Chiodi, Paride Pelucchi, Ettore Mosca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alice ChiodiInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, Segrate (Milan), Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6646-4471
Paride PelucchiInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, Segrate (Milan), Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5415-1515
Ettore MoscaInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, Segrate (Milan), Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3102-5150

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease phenotypes can be described as the consequence of interactions among molecular processes that are altered beyond resilience. Here, we address the challenge of assessing the possible alteration of intra- and inter-cellular molecular interactions among processes or cells. We present an approach, designated as "Ulisse", which complements the existing methods in the domains of enrichment analysis, pathway crosstalk analysis and cell-cell communication analysis. It applies to gene lists that contain quantitative information about gene-related alterations, typically derived in the context of omics or multi-omics studies. Ulisse highlights the presence of alterations in those components that control the interactions between processes or cells. Considering the complexity of statistical assessment of network-based analyses, crosstalk quantification is supported by two distinct null models, which systematically sample alternative configurations of gene-related changes and gene-gene interactions. Further, the approach provides an additional way of identifying the genes associated with the phenotype. As a proof-of-concept, we applied Ulisse to study the alteration of pathway crosstalks and cell-cell communications in triple negative breast cancer samples, based on single-cell RNA sequencing. In conclusion, our work supports the usefulness of crosstalk analysis as an additional instrument in the "toolkit" of biomedical research for translating complex biological data into actionable insights.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationGenomicsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMultiomicsProof of Concept StudySignal TransductionSingle-Cell Gene Expression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41124151
PMCPMC12543113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.