ArticlePloS one2025
Saur and decline: Patterns in lizard imports to the US (2000-2022).
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The United States is an important component of global wildlife trade and benefits from the recording of trade data in the US Law Enforcement Management Information System (LEMIS). Despite its limitations, studies are beginning to highlight broad trends of US wildlife trade using this dataset which warrants further, more focused, investigations into taxon-specific data available within LEMIS data. I used LEMIS data to investigate patterns in lizard imports to the US between 2000 and 2022. Over 18.8 million whole lizards, comprised of 1,002 species, 259 genera, and 39 families, were imported to the US during this recording period. Similar to overall wildlife trade trends, many of the lizards were wild-sourced (61.7%) and likely imported due to the demands from the pet trade (99.8% for commercial purposes). The majority of the importations were of lizards from three families-Gekkonidae, Agamidae, and Iguanidae-which combined made up over 66% of all imports despite constituting only 7.7% of the family diversity. Overall, there was a decline in the number of lizard imports over time, yet there was an increase in the number of species being imported; with newly imported species increasing linearly. I highlight and discuss some of the patterns and implications that the lizard import data are suggesting, such as drivers of lizard imports, invasion risk, geographic collection "hotspots", and limitations of the LEMIS data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.