ArticlePloS one2025
A journey of partnership: Supporting Indigenous science in Western, colonial-grounded academic institutions.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Indigenous Research Sovereignty Within Academia: Challenges and Opportunities.SSM. Mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEngagement of Indigenous science (Indigenous research, knowledges, and processes) is increasingly recognized within institutions of higher learning, funding bodies, and publication outlets. Respectful and authentic support for Indigenous science requires transformations of Western, colonial-grounded knowledge and knowledge processes, bodies, and institutions to meaningfully and appropriately include Indigenous ways of knowing, being, and doing.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to identify fundamental changes required to support Indigenous science within Western, colonial-grounded academic institutions focusing on "Identity and Colonial Institutions".
methodsIn 2019, a three-day gathering of 18 Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers and trainees, Elder/knowledge helper/knowledge keepers, and community members was held in Treaty 1 territory and birthplace of the Métis Nation. Through talking circles, participants shared their experiences working with Indigenous communities on projects involving Indigenous knowledges.
resultsThematic analysis drew meaning from the talking circles, identifying four main themes: 1) Building Bridges; 2) Institutional Practice; 3) Original Knowledges; and 4) Multifaceted Identity. Focusing on "Identity and Colonial Institutions" stemming from these themes, recommendations for supporting Indigenous science were identified around four central actions: 1) Embedding respectful and authentic support; 2) Acceptance, endorsement, incorporation, and education among the broader research community; 3) Prioritizing and valuing Indigenous research, knowledges, processes, and contributions; and 4) Privileging of multiple worldviews.
conclusionsInstitutions, funding agencies, journals, and all individuals, organizations, and entities involved in research are encouraged to enact these recommendations and take action to support Indigenous science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.