ArticlePloS one2025
A machine learning approach for predicting 72-hour mortality of hypothermic patients only using non-invasive parameters: A multi-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAccurately predicting the mortality risk of hypothermia patients is crucial for clinical decision-making, offering ample time for physicians to intervene. However, existing methods are invasive and difficult to implement in pre-hospital settings.
methodsIn this study, records of 2,700 hypothermia patients from 125 hospitals were extracted from the eICU Collaborative Research database, comprising 360 non-survivors and 2,340 survivors. Four machine learning methods were utilized to develop a mortality prediction model for hypothermia patients based on non-invasive physiological parameters. Data from 122 hospitals were used for model training, while the remainder were utilized for performance validation.
resultsThe proposed machine learning prediction model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.869 (95%CI: 0.840-0.895), demonstrating good mortality predictive performance for hypothermia patients only using non-invasive physiological parameters. Optimal and minimal feature subsets were selected for each machine learning method. The optimal feature subsets contained only 70.6% of the overall features for XGBoost models, while the AUC values increased by 0.039 compared to that of the entire feature subset. The interpretability analysis results highlight the vital importance of the temperature feature in predicting mortality during episodes of hypothermia in patients.
conclusionsThis study developed a mortality prediction method for hypothermia patients only using non-invasive parameters, demonstrating robustness and reliability during multi-center validation. It can offer decision support for remote areas and disaster sites where it is difficult to access invasive parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.