ArticlePloS one2025
Assessing the effects of prosthetic foot stiffness and foot preference on stability, balance confidence, and satisfaction in transtibial prosthesis users: Protocol for a randomized, participant-masked crossover trial using a 'test-drive' strategy.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05473065 (A Prosthetic Foot Test-Drive Strategy for Improving Stability and Falls-Related Outcomes in Veterans With Leg Amputations), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prosthetic Foot Test-Drive Strategy for Improving Stability and Falls-Related Outcomes in Veterans With Leg Amputations
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWith an appropriate prescription, the use of a lower limb prosthesis can help mitigate mobility limitations and increased risk of falling for people with lower limb amputation. Prosthetic feet cannot replicate all the functions of a biological foot-ankle. Different feet have different designs and properties, and therefore there are functional trade-offs. There is insufficient evidence as to the effects these different prosthetic foot properties have on users' stability and balance, which would be helpful to guide clinical prosthesis prescription. Prosthesis users also rarely have opportunities to try walking with different prosthetic feet to give experiential input during the prescription process. Therefore, this study aims to determine 1) the effects of prosthetic foot stiffness on stability in lower limb prosthesis users while walking on varying terrains, and 2) whether a brief 'test-drive' strategy for selecting prosthetic feet can be used to predict longer term stability, balance confidence, and foot preference outcomes in lower limb prosthesis users. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this multisite, participant-masked, randomized cross-over study, participants with unilateral, transtibial amputation will walk on different treadmill conditions (flat, incline, cross-slopes, uneven ground) with a variety of commercially-available prosthetic feet ('actual') and corresponding 'emulated' prosthetic feet in the laboratory. Participants will also wear the actual prosthetic feet at home and in the community for one week at a time. After each community trial, participants will return to the laboratory to complete walking trials on different terrains and at a range of speeds while we collect kinematic data. We will assess the effect of prosthetic foot stiffness on biomechanical and self-reported measures of stability. We will also assess how well brief 'test-drive' trials of walking with different prosthetic feet can predict longer-term self-reported measures of stability, balance confidence and preference.
trial registrationThis study was prospectively registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (Clinical Trials Study ID: NCT05473065). Study start date: March 1, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.