ArticleHealth promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice2025
Uncertainty communication, trust and health promotion.
Article in Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health promotion is more effective when health communicators are considered trustworthy. However, health communicators must often deal with uncertainties in the knowledge base on which they rely. In this commentary, we discuss the benefits of acknowledging uncertainty, with caveats and best practices to cultivate trust. We recommend determining the type of uncertainty involved and selecting appropriate communication approaches. We also advise that communicators emphasize the positive elements of the uncertainty, whenever possible, such as when it reflects a growing evidence base. Health promoters should consider the long-term outcomes of communicating uncertainty, as these may differ from the short-term outcomes. We identify knowledge gaps and areas ripe for future research. We also show that uncertainty can often be communicated without harming trust in the communicator, and that communicators should rely on evidence-based best practices. We aim to provoke further discussion on how uncertainty should be understood and framed in health promotion efforts, guiding communicators on how to maintain public trust amid unknowns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.