Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41124023›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Tomtom-lite: accelerating Tomtom enables large-scale and real-time motif similarity scoring.

Jacob Schreiber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cross-species consensus atlas of the primate basal ganglia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jacob SchreiberResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna 1030, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4230-6625

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH and the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG, FO999902549Molecular Pathology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryPairwise sequence similarity is a core operation in genomic analysis, yet most attention has been given to sequences made up of discrete characters. With the growing prevalence of machine learning, calculating similarities for sequences of continuous representations, e.g. frequency-based position-weight matrices (PWMs) and attribution-based contribution-weight matrices, is taking on newfound importance. Tomtom has previously been proposed as an algorithm for identifying pairs of PWMs whose similarity is statistically significant, but the implementation remains inefficient for both real-time and large-scale analysis. Accordingly, we have re-implemented Tomtom as a numba-accelerated Python function that is natively multi-threaded, avoids cache misses, more efficiently caches intermediate values, and uses approximations at compute bottlenecks. Here, we provide a detailed description of the original Tomtom method and present results demonstrating that our re-implementation can achieve over a 1000-fold speedup compared with the original tool on reasonable tasks. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our implementation of Tomtom is freely available as a Python package at https://github.com/jmschrei/memesuite-lite, which can be downloaded via pip install memelite or at https://zenodo.org/records/17008952.

Indexed as

GenomicsSoftwareAlgorithmsPosition-Specific Scoring Matrices

Identifiers

PMID41124023
PMCPMC12619998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.