ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2025
Engineering Hollow-Structured Carbon Framework to Facilitate High-Sulfur-Content Encapsulation for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.
Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Engineering Hollow-Structured Carbon Framework to Facilitate High-Sulfur-Content Encapsulation for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lithium-sulfur batteries (LSBs) have emerged as promising candidates for next-generation energy storage systems due to their high theoretical energy density and cost-effectiveness. However, their practical application is severely limited by the shuttle effect of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) and the inherently low electrical conductivity of sulfur, which leads to rapid capacity fading and poor rate performance. To address these challenges, this work develops a hollow-structured graphitic nitrogen-doped porous carbon (h-GNPC) framework derived from zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 via a magnesiothermic reduction (MR) process. This method effectively tailors the pore architecture and electrical conductivity, enabling efficient sulfur encapsulation and high sulfur loading up to 90 wt.%. Compared to a carbon host treated without the MR method, the h-GNPC exhibits enhanced porosity, which can accommodate sulfur with stabilized cyclability. As a result, a coin cell with sulfur-loaded h-GNPC cathode exhibits an initial capacity of 1292.9 mAh g
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.