ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2025
Mechanism-Aware Deep Learning for Polar Reaction Prediction.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-driven drug discovery: a deep learning paradigm shift in pharmaceutical research and development.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately predicting chemical reactions is essential for driving innovation in synthetic chemistry, with broad applications in medicine, manufacturing, and agriculture. Yet reaction prediction remains a complex problem that is both time-consuming and resource-intensive for chemists to solve. Deep learning offers an appealing solution by enabling high-throughput prediction, but most existing models are trained on the US Patent Office data set and treat reactions as recipes or overall transformations─mapping reactants directly to products with limited mechanistic insight. To address this, we introduce PMechRP (Polar Mechanistic Reaction Predictor), trained on the PMechDB data set of polar elementary steps that capture electron flow and mechanistic detail. To broaden coverage and improve generalization, we augment PMechDB with combinatorially generated reactions and train models spanning transformer, graph, and two-stage Siamese architectures. In addition to reaction prediction models, we also develop ArrowFinder, a new model that directly predicts arrow-pushing mechanisms for a set of reactants and products. Our best-performing approach is a hybrid pipeline that combines an ensemble of Chemformer models with a two-stage Siamese framework, leveraging the accuracy of transformers while filtering away "alchemical" products using the two-step network and generating mechanistic annotations using ArrowFinder. This approach achieves strong predictive accuracy while also providing interpretable predictions. We evaluate performance across multiple benchmarks: PMechDB test splits, a curated USPTO subset from the Open Reaction Database, and a human benchmark of mechanistic pathways from an intermediate-level textbook.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.