Trial reportJAMA dermatology2025
Hydrocolloid Dressing vs Petroleum Ointment for Scar Appearance After Dermatologic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05618912 (Scar Appearance After Postoperative Hydrocolloid Dressing Versus Standard Petrolatum Ointment), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Scar Appearance After Postoperative Hydrocolloid Dressing Versus Standard Petrolatum Ointment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart Polymeric Wound Dressings for Wound Treatment: Contributions and Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- 20-MHz high-intensity focused ultrasound for tattoo removal without pigment-specific optical targeting and with evidence for an ablation-associated transepidermal extrusion pathway.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Hydrocolloid dressings (HCDs) are designed to promote wound healing; however, there are no randomized clinical trials comparing changes in scar appearance using HCD vs daily petroleum ointment after excisional surgery. Objective: To determine whether a 1-time application of HCD for 1 week after excisional surgery affects scar appearance and surgical complications compared to daily petroleum ointment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was an investigator-blinded, individually randomized clinical trial conducted from October 2022 to October 2023 at a large public university in Indiana of adult (≥18 years) patients undergoing standard excision or Mohs micrographic surgery with linear bilayered repair. Exclusion criteria included flap or graft use, topical chemotherapy agents used on surgical site, allergy to adhesives, scar in hair-bearing site, previous use of HCD, and communication barriers. Data analysis was conducted from November 2023 to March 2025. Interventions: HCD application over the excisional surgery site for 1 week or daily reapplication of petroleum ointment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient-reported scar appearance using a modified Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included VAS scores from 3 Mohs surgeons who were blinded, rates of surgical complications, and patient ratings for comfort and convenience. Results: Of the 444 screened, 146 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.9 [12.9] years; 85 female [58%] and 61 male [41.8%] individuals) were randomized, 72 to HCD and 74 to petroleum ointment; demographic characteristics were similar between groups. Surgeon and patient ratings for overall appearance were clinically comparable. At 7 days, the difference in mean VAS rating between HCD and petroleum groups was -0.40 (95% CI, -0.70 to -0.10); at 30 days, it was -0.08 (95% CI, -0.38 to 0.23); and at 90 days, -0.09 (95% CI, -0.41 to 0.23). The HCD group had higher, but not statistically significant, rates of adverse events, including postoperative bleeding (20.6% for HCD vs 8.8% for petroleum), wound dehiscence (6.2% vs 0), and surgical site pain (21.2% vs 12.3). No patients required postoperative antibiotics. A greater proportion in the HCD group rated the HCD as convenient or extremely convenient (86.9% vs 46.8%; difference, 40.1% [95% CI, 24.9% to 55.3%]) and comfortable or extremely comfortable (73.8% vs 48.3%; difference, 25.4% [95% CI, 8.7% to 42.2]). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that HCD is a suitable postoperative option after dermatologic surgery, yielding similar scar appearance and complication rates as daily petroleum ointment. Therefore, the clinical decision to use HCD vs daily petroleum ointment should balance cost and patient preferences with their risk of postoperative complications. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05618912.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.