Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41123869›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2026

Predicting brand share after LOE in chronic disease market using machine learning.

Seho Park, Kahyun Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seho ParkDepartment of Industrial and Data Engineering, Hongik University, Seoul, 04066, Republic of Korea.
Kahyun LeeCollege of Business Administration, Hongik University, Seoul, 04066, Republic of Korea. leekahy@hongik.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0839-7498

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss of Exclusivity (LOE) marks a turning point for brand-name drugs, triggering rapid share erosion as generics enter the market. Yet existing forecasting methods-often based on simple parametric decay curves-struggle with data scarcity, suffer from low predictive accuracy, and fail to capture counter-trend share rebounds. In this study, we assemble a 20-year panel of chronic-disease LOE events in South Korea (Hypertension, Lipidemia, Diabetes) and evaluate a range of forecasting algorithms, from classical machine learning to cutting-edge neural networks. Our best-in-class N-BEATS model predicts absolute brand share with an RMSE of .034 and MAPE of .073, while a Random Forest achieves an RMSE of .014 and MAPE of .147 for quarter-to-quarter changes. Notably, our approach successfully captures rare post-LOE share recoveries that traditional parametric benchmarks miss. SHAP analysis reveals that the number of generics is the dominant driver of absolute share levels, whereas time since LOE most strongly influences short-term fluctuations; additionally, brand-holder partnerships with local distributors meaningfully affect both outcomes. These findings lay the groundwork for a data-driven, practical forecasting framework-enabling patent holders and generic manufacturers to align lifecycle and market-access strategies with the key levers of post-LOE dynamics-and point toward even more robust insights as larger LOE datasets become available in future research.

Indexed as

Drug IndustryDrugs, GenericMachine LearningAlgorithmsChronic DiseaseForecastingHumansRepublic of KoreaDrugs, GenericC53I11I18L65

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.