Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41123866›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026

An open-source, externally validated neural network algorithm to recognize daily-life gait of older adults based on a lower-back sensor.

Yuge Zhang, Sjoerd M Bruijn, Michiel Punt, Jorunn L Helbostad, Mirjam Pijnappels, Sina David

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuge ZhangDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van Der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7440-0371
Sjoerd M BruijnDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van Der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michiel PuntResearch Group Lifestyle and Health, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jorunn L HelbostadDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Mirjam PijnappelsDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van Der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sina DavidDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van Der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.david@vu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9741-7202

Funding

China Scholarship Council 202009110145Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 016.Vidi.178.014Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 91714344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait recognition is critical for daily-life fall risk assessment and rehabilitation monitoring, but existing models face many challenges that limit their use in daily life for older adults. We aimed to develop an open-source gait recognition for older adults using sensor data and explore the effect of data augmentation on model training. A convolutional neural network was trained using lower-back inertial sensor data from 20 participants (mean age 76.4) and externally validated on 47 participants (mean age 72.3). The model was trained using 6-channel data (accelerations and angular velocities) and 3-channel data (accelerations only), with and without data augmentation. On the testing dataset, the best 6-channel model achieved accuracy of 91.4%, precision of 59.7%, sensitivity of 99.5%, F1-score of 74.7%, and specificity of 90.3%, and the best 3-channel model achieved accuracy of 96.5%, precision of 78.7%, sensitivity of 98.9%, F1-score of 87.6%, and specificity of 96.1%. On the external validation dataset, the best models with both channels show near-perfect scores. This study demonstrates that the convolutional neural network algorithm based on lower-back inertial sensor data can accurately recognize daily-life gait of older adults, and data augmentation was especially beneficial for models using acceleration data only.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAlgorithmsGaitNeural Networks, ComputerAccidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleAgedClassificationDeep learningDigital healthWalking

Identifiers

PMID41123866
PMCPMC12950066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.