ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
An open-source, externally validated neural network algorithm to recognize daily-life gait of older adults based on a lower-back sensor.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Smart Sensor-Driven Gait Rehabilitation Walker Using Machine Learning for Predictive Home-Based Therapy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gait recognition is critical for daily-life fall risk assessment and rehabilitation monitoring, but existing models face many challenges that limit their use in daily life for older adults. We aimed to develop an open-source gait recognition for older adults using sensor data and explore the effect of data augmentation on model training. A convolutional neural network was trained using lower-back inertial sensor data from 20 participants (mean age 76.4) and externally validated on 47 participants (mean age 72.3). The model was trained using 6-channel data (accelerations and angular velocities) and 3-channel data (accelerations only), with and without data augmentation. On the testing dataset, the best 6-channel model achieved accuracy of 91.4%, precision of 59.7%, sensitivity of 99.5%, F1-score of 74.7%, and specificity of 90.3%, and the best 3-channel model achieved accuracy of 96.5%, precision of 78.7%, sensitivity of 98.9%, F1-score of 87.6%, and specificity of 96.1%. On the external validation dataset, the best models with both channels show near-perfect scores. This study demonstrates that the convolutional neural network algorithm based on lower-back inertial sensor data can accurately recognize daily-life gait of older adults, and data augmentation was especially beneficial for models using acceleration data only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.