Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41123841›Full record

ReviewAdvances in therapy2025

Mental Health Experiences and Challenges Among Individuals with Myasthenia Gravis: Insights from Patient-Centered, Qualitative Analyses.

Rachelle D Rodriguez, Ashley E L Anderson, Kelly G Gwathmey, Caroline R Brethenoux, Lisa M Shea, Raghav Govindarajan, Nizar Souayah, Wesley D Peters, Louis A Jackson, Zia U Choudhry

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07649187 (Association of Baseline Depressive Tendency With Post-Counseling Clinical Status in Patients With Thymoma-Associated Myasthenia Gravis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07649187 nacompletednot on this map

Association of Baseline Depressive Tendency With Post-Counseling Clinical Status in Patients With Thymoma-Associated Myasthenia Gravis

TypeinterventionalSponsorMing-Hsing ChangRan2024 to 2025Enrolled19ConditionsMyasthenia Gravis, Depression, Thymoma, Depression and Quality of LifeArmsPsychological counseling intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rachelle D RodriguezJohnson & Johnson, Raritan, NJ, USA. rachelle.d.rodriguez@gmail.com.
Ashley E L AndersonHouston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Kelly G GwathmeyDepartment of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Caroline R BrethenouxHuman Dot Plus, Dallas, TX, USA.
Lisa M SheaJohnson & Johnson, Horsham, PA, USA.
Raghav GovindarajanHSHS Medical Group Multispecialty Care - St. Elizabeth's, O'Fallon, IL, USA.
Nizar SouayahDepartment of Neurology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Wesley D PetersEvidera, Wilmington, NC, USA.
Louis A JacksonJohnson & Johnson, Horsham, PA, USA.
Zia U ChoudhryJohnson & Johnson, Horsham, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHistorically, anxiety and depression rates have been higher among individuals with myasthenia gravis (MG) than the general population, and self-reported sentiments and experiences of mental health impairment may be more common than formal diagnoses. Patient-centered research can provide insight into self-described anxiety and depressive symptoms and stressors experienced by those with MG in the United States (US) and improve understanding of the current prevalence of anxiety and depression.

methodsInsights were collected from three sources. First, a literature review of quantitative and/or real-world studies of anxiety/depression among individuals with gMG in the US. Second, a secondary, qualitative analysis of the transcripts from focus groups conducted with 12 individuals with self-reported generalized MG. Third, analysis of thousands of online conversations between people with self-reported ocular or generalized MG using search, data extraction, and artificial intelligence-powered algorithms. No statistical analyses were performed.

resultsThe literature review identified three studies (precluding a meta-analysis): prevalence estimates for depression were 19% (diagnosed), 31% (receiving antidepressants), and 75% (self-reported sentiments), and for anxiety were 17%, 19% (both diagnosed), and 82% (self-reported sentiments). Unique stressors and triggers were identified, classified into four categories: experience of symptoms/uncontrolled symptoms; burden of medical care; daily life functioning, responsibilities, and aspirations; and social support needs. The relative prominence of each stressor and its induced emotion varied by stage in the disease journey: fear and anxiety were discussed more frequently prior to MG diagnosis, whereas hopelessness and depression became more prominent later, during ongoing disease monitoring and management. Patients felt that stress worsened symptoms in a positive feedback loop.

conclusionThis qualitative, hypothesis-generating study found that individuals with MG in the US were more likely to report experiencing anxiety and depression than the general population due, at least in part, to their MG-specific disease journey and the uncontrolled symptoms experienced.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionMyasthenia GravisAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePrevalenceQualitative ResearchStress, PsychologicalUnited StatesAnxietyDepressionMental healthMyasthenia gravisStressorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41123841
PMCPMC12618421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.