ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Postoperative complication rates of surgeons during the supervised training program in robotic-assisted colorectal surgery.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hugo RAS Versus Da Vinci in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Outcome Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has established itself as an advanced technique in colorectal surgery, providing better postoperative outcomes due to its greater precision and less invasiveness. However, RAS requires dedicated and supervised training to avoid complications in the initial learning curve. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a supervised RAS training program focusing on postoperative complications, and its classification according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade. This is a retrospective, single-center cohort study that included only patients undergoing RAS performed by specialized colorectal surgeons in supervised training. Postoperative complications were evaluated according to the CD classification. A total of 226 patients undergoing different colorectal surgical procedures performed between December 2021 and November 2023 were included. Demographic, clinical, and operative data were collected and compared with the results of previously published studies in order to evaluate the efficacy of supervised training. The median age of patients was 58 years and 58.8% of them were male. The most common surgeries were sigmoidectomy (50%) and rectosigmoidectomy with total mesorectal excision (19%). The overall complication rate was 7.5%, and the most frequent were anastomotic fistulas (2.6%) and intraperitoneal abscesses (1.7%). The mean surgical time was 175 min, and the median hospital stay was three days. According to CD classification 10 patients (4, 4%) developed surgical complications classified as CD III, CD V (0, 4%), CD IV (0.8%), CD I (0.8%), CD II (0, 8%). Patients with complications grade III and IV had significantly longer hospital stay. One patient died (0.4%). The complication rates found were comparable to those reported in the international literature, demonstrating that the risk of complications did not increase during well-structured and supervised training. The risk of perioperative complications during supervised and well-structured training in RAS is similar to those reported in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41123833What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.