ReviewCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2025
Microphysiological systems for metastasis research: a stepwise approach.
Review in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical memory as a metastatic compass: a comparative framework for understanding organotropism through biophysical priming.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Deconstructing cancer in 3D: models, mechanisms, and personalized solutions.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- The immune microenvironment of the central nervous system and neuromodulation: new perspectives in lung cancer brain metastases research.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastasis, the leading cause of cancer-related mortality, is a complex process involving tumor cell detachment from the primary site, survival and dissemination through the circulation, and colonization of distant organs. At each stage, tumor cells face adaptive pressures from successive biological and biomechanical challenges in the local microenvironment, which collectively shape their progression. Traditional in vitro models often fail to replicate these dynamics, while animal models are limited by species differences and restricted real-time monitoring. Microphysiological systems (MPS) have emerged as powerful tools to address these limitations, delivering physiologically relevant cues and precise experimental control to recapitulate step-specific metastatic contexts. This review outlines recent advances in MPS designs for modeling critical hallmarks of metastasis, beginning with matrix interactions, stromal cells, and mechanical forces from the tumor microenvironment that drive epithelial-mesenchymal transition and invasion. The discussion then transitions to MPS that reproduce vascular physiology during intravasation, circulation, and extravasation, and concludes with organ-specific environments for studying colonization and organotropic behavior in the final stages of metastasis. Additionally, common MPS configurations, categorized into horizontal and vertical compartmental arrangements, and strategies for integrating vascularization are explored. Together, these advances highlight the potential of MPS in elucidating metastatic mechanisms and advancing targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.