Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41123805›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2025

Religion and Vasectomy Uptake Among Married Men in the USA.

Jeremy E Uecker, Mackenzie Brewer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeremy E UeckerDepartment of Sociology, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97326, Waco, TX, 76798, USA. jeremy_uecker@baylor.edu.
Mackenzie BrewerDepartment of Sociology, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97326, Waco, TX, 76798, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite clear links between religious commitment, sexual behavior, and fertility, relatively little is known about religion's role in contraceptive practices, especially vasectomy uptake. Vasectomy is an understudied but important method of contraception that is safe and effective and shifts contraceptive labor from women to men. Existing studies of religion and vasectomy assess the impact of religion on women's reliance on their partner's vasectomy without directly measuring men's religious characteristics, are dated, and typically do not distinguish Protestant groups from one another. In this study, we analyze data from 25- to 44-year-old married men in the 2011-2019 National Survey of Family Growth (N = 4120) to assess differences in vasectomy uptake by religious affiliation and frequency of religious service attendance. The percentage of married men who are vasectomized varies substantially across religious affiliations, ranging from 3.5% among Hispanic Catholics to 18.5% among non-Hispanic Catholics. The differences among religious groups are mostly explained by income, race, ethnicity, age, and parity. However, even after controlling for these and other background factors, Hispanic Catholic men have a lower probability of being vasectomized than evangelical Protestants, mainline Protestants, non-Hispanic Catholics, and religiously unaffiliated men, suggesting their religious subculture has distinct norms around vasectomy. Religious service attendance is not associated with vasectomy uptake. Moreover, within-affiliation differences by religious service attendance are not statistically significant. Our findings suggest that vasectomy differences across religious affiliations track closely with race, ethnic, and class differences, but Hispanic Catholics are religiously distinct.

Indexed as

ContraceptionReligionReproductive healthVasectomy

Identifiers

PMID41123805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.