ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Health effects of loss of function variants in gene targets for Alzheimer's disease prevention.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatments for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have to date met with limited success but potentially promising approaches involve attempting to reduce expression of one of the genes coding for key proteins involved in AD pathogenesis. Potential targets for such interventions include APOE, APP and MAPT but there is little published evidence to help assess whether reducing expression of one of these genes might cause adverse effects. We investigated 470,000 exome-sequenced UK Biobank participants to identify those carrying a naturally occurring loss of function (LOF) variant in these genes to see if they had impaired general health or educational attainment. For APOE we additionally tested for association with hyperlipidaemia and for APP and MAPT we tested for associations with mental health and epilepsy. For APOE, APP and MAPT there were respectively 56, 118 and 333 carriers of LOF variants. For each gene, there was no association between carrying a LOF variant and any of the phenotypes tested and for some phenotypes confidence intervals of effect size were small, ruling out any large effect. The findings provide some reassurance that interventions aimed at reducing expression of one of these genes may not necessarily be associated with significant adverse effects, though the small number of phenotypes examined means we cannot be confident that such treatments would be completely safe. Since LOF variants are very rare, further investigation of the effects of reduced gene expression can be undertaken within the context of clinical trials. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.