ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2025
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Myocarditis: Diagnostic and Prognostic Evidence and Limitations.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early prediction of synergistic cardiotoxicity induced by PD-1 inhibitors and doxorubicin using cardiacChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Myotoxicity in the era of cancer immunotherapy: from mechanisms to multidisciplinary management.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated myocarditis (ICI-M) is rare but often severe. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) can detect myocardial edema and injury as well as fibrosis, yet its role in the setting of ICI-M remains uncertain. This review evaluates recent evidence on CMR findings, prognostic markers, and practical limitations in ICI-M. RECENT
findingsT1/T2 mapping and strain analysis may detect myocardial involvement not evident with conventional measures, but sensitivity is variable and affected by scan timing, prior therapies, and protocol heterogeneity. Prognostic associations have been reported for elevated native myocardial T1, septal late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and impaired strain, though not consistently. In oncology patients, interpretation is further complicated by potential baseline myocardial abnormalities. While CMR can contribute to the diagnostic work-up and risk assessment of ICI-M, current evidence is inconsistent and hampered by methodological limitations. CMR should be timely and findings should be interpreted alongside clinical, biological, ECG, echocardiographic and pathology data. Standardized multicenter prospective studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41123742What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.