SynthesisJournal of neurology2025
Prevalence of Fabry disease in cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCryptogenic stroke (CS) is an ischemic stroke with no identifiable cause after extensive evaluation and is particularly concerning in young adults. Among potential etiologies, Fabry disease (FD), a rare X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by GLA mutations, has been implicated. FD leads to α-galactosidase A deficiency and accumulation of globotriaosylceramide in endothelial cells, contributing to cerebrovascular events. However, the prevalence and clinical features of FD in CS remain uncertain. To determine the prevalence of FD in CS and characterize its classical manifestations.
methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD420251003865) in accordance with PRISMA 2020. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched through January 2025. Eligible studies assessed FD among adult CS patients using enzymatic and/or genetic testing. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates. Heterogeneity was evaluated via I
resultsSixteen studies (n = 7048) were included. The pooled prevalence of FD in CS was 1.3% (95% CI 0.75-2.32%; I
conclusionFD accounts for a small but clinically relevant proportion of cryptogenic strokes. Selective screening, especially in young males with systemic redflags, may improve early detection. Future research should adopt standardized diagnostic algorithms to enhance cost-effective identification and management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41123702What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.