Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41123679›Full record

ArticlePlant cell reports2025

Transgene-free genome editing in citrus and poplar trees using positive and negative selection markers.

Dhiôvanna Corrêia Rocha, Miracle Osazee Omoregbee, Danyel Fernandes Contiliani, Rushil Mandlik, Gen Li, Juliet Mascoveto, Gary Coleman, James N Culver, Daniel Rodriguez Leal, Alessandra Alves de Souza and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant cell reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dhiôvanna Corrêia Rocha *Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Miracle Osazee Omoregbee *Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Danyel Fernandes ContilianiDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Rushil MandlikDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Gen LiDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Juliet MascovetoDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Gary ColemanDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
James N CulverDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Daniel Rodriguez LealDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Alessandra Alves de SouzaCitrus Research Center "Sylvio Moreira"-Agronomic Institute (IAC), Cordeirópolis, SP, Brazil.
Yiping QiDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA. yiping@umd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9556-6706

Funding

Department of Energy DE-SC0023011Division of Integrative Organismal Systems 2224203Division of Integrative Organismal Systems IOS-2132693Division of Integrative Organismal Systems IOS-2428015FAPESP 2023/09068-9National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2020-33522-32274National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2020-70029- 33161National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2021-67013-34554National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2024-33522-42755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageTransgene-free genome editing of the gene of interest in citrus and poplar has been achieved by co-editing the ALS gene via transient transgene expression of an efficient cytosine base editor. CRISPR-Cas genome editing systems have been widely used in plants. However, such genome-edited plants are nearly always transgenic in the first generation when Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is used. Transgene-free genome-edited plants are valuable for genetic analysis and breeding as well as simplifying regulatory approval. It can be challenging to generate transgene-free genome-edited plants in vegetatively propagated or perennial plants. To advance transgene-free genome editing in citrus and poplar, we investigated a co-editing strategy using an efficient cytosine base editor (CBE) to edit the ALS gene to confer herbicide resistance combined with transient transgene expression and potential mobile RNA-based movement of CBE transcripts to neighboring, non-transgenic cells. An FCY-UPP based cytotoxin system was used to select non-transgenic plants that survive after culturing on 5-FC containing medium. While the editing efficiency is higher in poplar than in citrus, our results show that the CBE-based co-editing strategy works in both citrus and poplar, albeit with low efficiency for biallelic edits. Unexpectedly, the addition of the TLS mobile RNA sequence reduced genome editing efficiency in both transgenic and non-transgenic plants. Although a small fraction of escaping plants is detected in both positive and negative selection processes, our data demonstrate a promising approach for generating transgene-free base-edited plants.

Indexed as

CitrusGene EditingPopulusCRISPR-Cas SystemsGenetic MarkersGenome, PlantHerbicide ResistancePlants, Genetically ModifiedTransgenesGenetic MarkersALSCitrusCytosine base editingFCY-UPPMultiplexed co-editingPoplarTransgene-free

Identifiers

PMID41123679
PMCPMC12546424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.