ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Deep learning models for radiography body-part classification and chest radiograph projection/orientation classification: a multi-institutional study.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of deep learning methods in the classification of normal and pneumonia lung images.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesLarge-scale radiographic datasets often include errors in labels such as body parts or projection, which can undermine automated image analysis. Therefore, we aimed to develop and externally validate two deep-learning models-one for categorising radiographs by body part, and another for identifying projection and rotation of chest radiographs-using large, diverse datasets. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively collected radiographs from multiple institutions and public repositories. For the first model (Xp-Bodypart-Checker), we included seven categories (Head, Neck, Chest, Incomplete Chest, Abdomen, Pelvis, Extremities). For the second model (CXp-Projection-Rotation-Checker), we classified chest radiographs by projection (anterior-posterior, posterior-anterior, lateral) and rotation (upright, inverted, left rotation, right rotation). Both models were trained, tuned, and internally tested on separate data, then externally tested on radiographs from different institutions. Model performance was assessed using overall accuracy (micro, macro, and weighted) as well as one-vs.-all area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsIn the Xp-Bodypart-Checker development phase, we included 429,341 radiographs obtained from Institutions A, B, and MURA. In the CXp-Projection-Rotation-Checker development phase, we included 463,728 chest radiographs from CheXpert, PadChest, and Institution A. The Xp-Bodypart-Checker achieved AUC values of 1.00 (99% CI: 1.00-1.00) for all classes other than Incomplete Chest, which had an AUC value of 0.99 (99% CI: 0.98-1.00). The CXp-Projection-Rotation-Checker demonstrated AUC values of 1.00 (99% CI: 1.00-1.00) across all projection and rotation classifications.
conclusionThese models help automatically verify image labels in large radiographic databases, improving quality control across multiple institutions. KEY POINTS: Question This study examines how deep learning can accurately classify radiograph body parts and detect chest projection/orientation in large, multi-institutional datasets, enhancing metadata consistency for clinical and research workflows. Findings Xp-Bodypart-Checker classified radiographs into seven categories with AUC values of over 0.99 for all classes, while CXp-Projection-Rotation-Checker achieved AUC values of 1.00 across all projection and rotation classifications. Clinical relevance Trained on over 860,000 multi-institutional radiographs, our two deep-learning models classify radiograph body-part and chest radiograph projection/rotation, identifying mislabeled data and enhancing data integrity, thereby improving reliability for both clinical use and deep-learning research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.