Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41123599›Full record

Trial reportCancer research communications2025

Continuous versus Standard Palbociclib Treatment and Molecular Profiling of Solid Tissues and Liquid Biopsies in the CCTG MA.38 Trial in Advanced Breast Cancer.

Anil Abraham Joy, Nicholas Cheng, Karen A Gelmon, Mihaela Mates, Christine Desbiens, Mark Clemons, Sara Taylor, Julie Lemieux, Angela DeLuca, Louis Gasparini and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02630693 (Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Two Different Schedules of Palbociclib Plus Second Line Endocrine Therapy in Women With Estrogen Receptor Positive, HER2 Negative Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02630693 phase2completednot on this map

Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Two Different Schedules of Palbociclib Plus Second Line Endocrine Therapy in Women With Estrogen Receptor Positive, HER2 Negative Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorCanadian Cancer Trials GroupRan2016 to 2023Enrolled180ConditionsBreast CancerArmsPalbociclib 100mg, Palbociclib 125mg, Fulvestrant or Tamoxifen or Aromatase Inhibitor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Anil Abraham JoyDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4201-8930
Nicholas ChengComputational Biology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-9174-1099
Karen A GelmonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Vancouver Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4111-2757
Mihaela MatesDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-0982-3592
Christine DesbiensCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8922-6406
Mark ClemonsDivision of Medical Oncology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9392-8219
Sara TaylorMedical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Kelowna, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4437-1378
Julie LemieuxCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Université Laval Cancer Research Center, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6168-320X
Angela DeLucaDiagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-9971-9529
Louis GaspariniDiagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5418-6176
Ilinca LunguDiagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9996-5771
David SoaveComputational Biology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1325-7417
Alex FortunaGenome Sequence Informatics, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5587-2151
Trevor PughGenome Sequence Informatics, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8073-5888
Shuo Shuo LiuDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8396-4515
John M S BartlettDiagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0347-3888
Philip AwadallaComputational Biology, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9946-6393
Melanie SpearsDiagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1535-4675
Bingshu E ChenCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6139-0696
Jane BayaniDiagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1699-5888
Wendy R ParulekarCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6007-7494

Funding

Canadian Cancer Society (CCS) 704970Canadian Cancer Society (CCS) 707213Pfizer Canada (Pfizer Canada Inc.)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The randomized phase II MA.38 trial estimated the relative progression-free survival (PFS) associated with second-line endocrine therapy plus palbociclib administered on a 100 mg continuous daily dosing (CDD) schedule compared with the standard dose schedule (SDS) of 125 mg (days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle). A total of 180 patients were allocated 1:1 to protocol therapy. Molecular profiling was performed on the archival tissue and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) at enrollment, 3 months, and 6 months. The primary analysis for PFS demonstrated a similar outcome for the CDD versus SDS treatment strategy: HR = 0.93 (90% confidence interval, 0.66-1.30). Secondary efficacy measures for CDD versus SDS included the following: overall survival, HR = 1.07 (90% confidence interval, 0.67-1.69); response rate, 16.1% versus 18.0% (P = 0.66); median duration of response, 4.2 months (range, 2.8-13.9 months) versus 5.6 months (range, 2.4-13.9 months; P = 0.86); and clinical benefit rate, 53.2% versus 57.3% (P = 0.89). cfDNA profiling of the baseline enrollment sample prior to palbociclib commencement showed low tumor fraction (HR = 2.28; P = 9.9 × 10-6); higher short/long fragment length ratios (HR = 1.19; P = 0.049) and cfDNA variants in FGFR4 (HR = 3.65; P = 0.012) were prognostic and associated with inferior PFS. Variants in TP53 (HR = 2.48; P = 0.006) and ESR1 (HR = 3.42; P = 0.005) detected at 12 weeks on treatment were also associated with poor PFS. CDD palbociclib 100 mg dosing was not associated with improved efficacy compared with the standard intermittent 125 mg dosing schedule. Additionally, we identified prognostic biomarkers in alignment with prior research and demonstrated the value of cfDNA dynamics, including fragment length ratios and tumor fraction as a measure of treatment response. SIGNIFICANCE: A continuous 100 mg dosing schedule of palbociclib was tolerable but not associated with improved efficacy signals versus the standard intermittent 125 mg (days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle) schedule. Mutations detected in liquid biopsies and changes in cfDNA dynamics were linked to poor outcomes and may identify patients with treatment-resistant cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsPiperazinesPyridinesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalBiomarkers, TumorpalbociclibPiperazinesPyridines

Identifiers

PMID41123599
PMCPMC12613153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.