ArticleCancer2025
Decision regret in older adults with advanced cancer receiving systemic therapy: Associations with patient-reported and clinician-rated tolerability metrics.
Article in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02054741 (A Geriatric Assessment Intervention for Patients Aged 70 and Over Receiving Chemotherapy or Similar Agents for Advanced Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Geriatric Assessment Intervention for Patients Aged 70 and Over Receiving Chemotherapy or Similar Agents for Advanced Cancer: Reducing Toxicity in Older Adults
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regret concerning treatment decisions in patients with primary or secondary brain tumors - a cross-sectional exploratory bicentric analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDecision regret (DR) (distress or remorse after a treatment decision) has received limited examination in older adults with advanced cancer. The authors hypothesized that DR would change over time and be associated with worse patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and clinician-rated tolerability metrics over 6 months.
methodsAdults aged 70+ with advanced cancer planning to receive systemic treatment were recruited from a national trial (GAP70+, NCT02054741). DR level (none (0), mild [1-25], and moderate/severe [>25]) and PROs (symptoms, functional status, and satisfaction with treatment) were assessed at 4-6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment initiation and compared with ANOVA. Associations between clinician-rated grade >3 toxicities, and treatment-related hospitalizations and DR were examined with longitudinal linear mixed modeling.
resultsData from 623 patients (M = 77 years, 43% female, mixed diagnoses) who completed the DR scale at least once were analyzed. At 4-6 weeks, mean DR was 17.1 (SD = 15.7), with 50% reporting mild DR and 21% moderate/severe DR. Patients experiencing higher DR reported significantly higher concurrent symptom severity, lower functional scores, and lower treatment satisfaction (all p < .05). At 6 months, mean DR was 3.9 points higher (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-6.7, p = .006) in patients with any grade >3 toxicities and 6.8 points higher (95% CI, 3.4-10.2, p < .001) in patients with treatment-related hospitalization.
conclusionsDR changes over time and is associated with worse PROs and clinician-rated toxicity. Clinicians can discuss DR and poor tolerability in conversations about high-risk cancer treatment with older adults who have advanced cancer. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02054741.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.