Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41123451›Full record

ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2025

SNRAware: Improved Deep Learning MRI Denoising with Signal-to-Noise Ratio Unit Training and G-Factor Map Augmentation.

Hui Xue, Sarah M Hooper, Iain Pierce, Rhodri H Davies, John Stairs, Joseph Naegele, Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn, Charlotte Manisty, James C Moon, Thomas A Treibel and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hui XueHealth Futures, Microsoft Research, 14820 NE 36th St, Bldg 99, Rm 4941, Redmond, WA 98052.ORCID 0000-0002-4561-5530
Sarah M HooperNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.ORCID 0000-0001-9366-2174
Iain PierceBarts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8546-5023
Rhodri H DaviesInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7630-7517
John StairsHealth Futures, Microsoft Research, 14820 NE 36th St, Bldg 99, Rm 4941, Redmond, WA 98052.ORCID 0009-0005-0854-9318
Joseph NaegeleHealth Futures, Microsoft Research, 14820 NE 36th St, Bldg 99, Rm 4941, Redmond, WA 98052.ORCID 0009-0006-2986-2896
Adrienne E Campbell-WashburnNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.ORCID 0000-0002-7169-5693
Charlotte ManistyBarts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
James C MoonBarts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8071-1491
Thomas A TreibelBarts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Michael S Hansen *Health Futures, Microsoft Research, 14820 NE 36th St, Bldg 99, Rm 4941, Redmond, WA 98052.ORCID 0000-0002-8087-8731
Peter Kellman *Health Futures, Microsoft Research, 14820 NE 36th St, Bldg 99, Rm 4941, Redmond, WA 98052.ORCID 0000-0002-9875-6070

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose To develop and evaluate a deep learning-based MRI denoising method using quantitative noise distribution information obtained during image reconstruction to improve model performance and generalization. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included a training set of 2 885 236 images from 96 605 cardiac cine series acquired with 3-T MRI scanners from January 2018 to December 2020. Of these data, 95% were used for training, and 5% were used for validation. The hold-out test set included 3000 cine series, acquired in the same period. Fourteen model architectures were evaluated by instantiating each of the two backbone types with seven transformer and convolution block types. The proposed SNRAware training scheme leveraged MRI reconstruction knowledge to enhance denoising by simulating diverse synthetic datasets and providing quantitative noise distribution information. Internal testing measured performance using peak signal-to-noise ratio and structural similarity index measure, whereas external tests conducted with 1.5-T real-time cardiac cine, first-pass cardiac perfusion, brain, and spine MRI assessed generalization across various sequences, contrast agents, anatomies, and field strengths. Results SNRAware improved performance on internal tests conducted on a hold-out dataset of 3000 cine series. Models trained without reconstruction knowledge achieved the worst performance metrics. Improvement was architecture agnostic for both convolution and transformer models. However, transformer models outperformed their convolutional counterparts. Additionally, three-dimensional input tensors showed improved performance over two-dimensional images. The best-performing model from the internal testing generalized well to external samples, delivering 6.5 and 2.9 times contrast-to-noise ratio improvement for real-time cine and perfusion imaging, respectively. The model trained using only cardiac cine data generalized well to three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo brain and T2-weighted turbo spin-echo spine MRI acquisitions. Conclusion The SNRAware training scheme leveraged data obtained during the image reconstruction process for deep learning-based MRI denoising training, resulting in improved performance and good generalization.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineSignal-To-Noise RatioHeartHumansRetrospective StudiesDeep LearningMRIMRI Denoising

Identifiers

PMID41123451
PMCPMC12665503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.