ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2025
SNRAware: Improved Deep Learning MRI Denoising with Signal-to-Noise Ratio Unit Training and G-Factor Map Augmentation.
Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Two-For-One": 4D Cardiac and Pulmonary MR Imaging From a Single Acquisition Using bSTAR.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Trial
- In Vivo Imaging With a Low-Cost MRI Scanner and Cloud Data Processing in Low-Resource Settings.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose To develop and evaluate a deep learning-based MRI denoising method using quantitative noise distribution information obtained during image reconstruction to improve model performance and generalization. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included a training set of 2 885 236 images from 96 605 cardiac cine series acquired with 3-T MRI scanners from January 2018 to December 2020. Of these data, 95% were used for training, and 5% were used for validation. The hold-out test set included 3000 cine series, acquired in the same period. Fourteen model architectures were evaluated by instantiating each of the two backbone types with seven transformer and convolution block types. The proposed SNRAware training scheme leveraged MRI reconstruction knowledge to enhance denoising by simulating diverse synthetic datasets and providing quantitative noise distribution information. Internal testing measured performance using peak signal-to-noise ratio and structural similarity index measure, whereas external tests conducted with 1.5-T real-time cardiac cine, first-pass cardiac perfusion, brain, and spine MRI assessed generalization across various sequences, contrast agents, anatomies, and field strengths. Results SNRAware improved performance on internal tests conducted on a hold-out dataset of 3000 cine series. Models trained without reconstruction knowledge achieved the worst performance metrics. Improvement was architecture agnostic for both convolution and transformer models. However, transformer models outperformed their convolutional counterparts. Additionally, three-dimensional input tensors showed improved performance over two-dimensional images. The best-performing model from the internal testing generalized well to external samples, delivering 6.5 and 2.9 times contrast-to-noise ratio improvement for real-time cine and perfusion imaging, respectively. The model trained using only cardiac cine data generalized well to three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo brain and T2-weighted turbo spin-echo spine MRI acquisitions. Conclusion The SNRAware training scheme leveraged data obtained during the image reconstruction process for deep learning-based MRI denoising training, resulting in improved performance and good generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.