ArticleACS nano2025
Revealing and Engineering Assembly Pathways of 3D DNA Origami Crystals.
Article in ACS nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Directing Assembly of Mesoscale Multi-Shell Morphologies of DNA Origami Crystals.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- DNA Origami and Their Application in Biosensors.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Comprehensive Review on DNA Hydrogels and DNA Origami-Enabled Wearable and Implantable Biosensors.Biosensors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent developments in nanomaterial self-assembly demonstrate the capability to create tailored nanostructures by engineering both the binding coordination and specificity of interactions between material subunits. DNA origami frames allow for the design and fabrication of a broad variety of ordered 3D nanoscale architectures through self-assembly, facilitated by frame-to-frame bonds with designable strength and specificity. While the bond design is critical to lattice formation, the assembly process itself is often dependent on a thermal pathway. Highly ordered nanoscale frameworks, assembled from DNA frames, are predominantly crystallized through thermal annealing pathways that typically follow a "slow" cooling approach, with experiments on the time scale of days yielding DNA origami crystals in the range of 1-10 μm. This extended assembly time scale hinders the study of crystal formation pathways, necessitating a deeper understanding of factors governing successful annealing. Lack of insight into time scale also presents a practical limitation for material fabrication. Here, we investigate key factors affecting lattice assembly pathways and demonstrate that precise engineering of assembly conditions greatly reduces assembly times by up to nearly 2 orders of magnitude. We evaluate the nucleation and growth of crystals via optical and electron microscopy, and small-angle X-ray scattering techniques, mapping the time-temperature-transformation of superlattices from the melt through single-crystal optical tracking. The results show that origami frame assembly can be described by classical nucleation and growth theory, which can, in turn, be used to prescribe the growth of the crystals. Lastly, these findings are applied to demonstrate thermal pathway-dependent assembly, forming distinct assemblies based on different thermal annealing profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.