Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41123328›Full record

ArticleOperative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)2026

Awake Craniotomy in Patients With Language Deficits: A Retrospective Cohort Study in 48 Patients.

Suzanne L Hartung, Irene M C Huenges Wajer, Martine J E van Zandvoort, Pierre A Robe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Suzanne L HartungDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht , the Netherlands.
Irene M C Huenges WajerDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht , the Netherlands.
Martine J E van ZandvoortDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht , the Netherlands.
Pierre A RobeDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht , the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThis retrospective cohort study reviewed the feasibility and applicability of awake surgery for glioma in patients with clinically relevant preoperative language deficits, specifically focusing on intraoperative language monitoring and its impact on postoperative language outcomes.

methodsGroup and individual analyses were conducted to compare preoperative and postoperative language deficits. In addition, an overview of intraoperative tests was provided, and an evaluation of the monitoring process was performed.

resultsIn 100% of patients with significant (z score ≤ -1 SD) preoperative language deficits (N = 48), language tasks could be performed during awake surgery. In 90% of these cases, functional boundaries for language function were found during surgery.

conclusionThis study confirms the feasibility and applicability of monitoring language functions during awake brain surgery when preoperative language deficits are present. Both low-grade and high-grade glioma patients show an overall stable performance on a language comprehension test and an improved performance on a language production test 3 to 6 months after surgery and, therefore, seemed to benefit from cognitive monitoring.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCraniotomyGliomaLanguage DisordersWakefulnessAdultAgedCohort StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, IntraoperativeRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAwake craniotomyCognitive monitoringFeasibilityLanguage

Identifiers

PMID41123328
PMCPMC13348829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.