Trial reportThe oncologist2025
Randomized controlled trial on eurythmy therapy versus slow-paced physical exercises for the treatment of fatigue in metastatic breast cancer patients.
Trial report in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04024267 (Eurythmy Therapy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Eurythmy Therapy (ERYT) as a Treatment Option for Fatigue in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer-related fatigue is among the most taxing symptoms of breast cancer patients, but there is currently no established treatment standard. This study assessed the effect of eurythmy therapy (ERYT), a tailored mindful movement therapy, compared to slow-paced physical exercises (CoordiFit) on fatigue in metastatic breast cancer patients.
methodsWe used a randomized controlled, open-label, multi-center, two-arm design. Ten certified oncology centers across Switzerland participated in the trial. Women with metastatic breast cancer who agreed to participate in the study were randomly allocated to one of the two study arms in a 1:1 ratio. The intervention sessions in both groups followed the same schedule in terms of frequency and duration over a period of 20 weeks. Outcomes were assessed using standard clinical assessment scales at baseline, weeks 8, 14, and 20, as well as at 6- and 12-months follow-up. The primary endpoint was the change in cancer-related fatigue (baseline to end of intervention), whereas secondary endpoints included quality of life, pain, sleep quality, depression, anxiety, distress, and arm mobility. Data was analyzed using two-way mixed ANOVA.
resultsThe study was terminated before its completion due to insufficient enrollment. Prior to its closure, a total of 19 patients (median age: 59.5, range 51-82) agreed to participate in the study, of whom 10 completed the full intervention (n = 5 per group). Although the small sample size limits the possibility of statistical inference, tentative analyses pointed to significant improvements in fatigue in response to both experimental and control interventions (F(1,8)=14.176, P = .006), with no difference between groups. Among secondary endpoints we found a main group effect in quality of life, which was significantly higher in the ERYT group (F(1,8)=7.179, P = .028), as well as an interaction effect in pain interference, the latter significantly improving in the ERYT group but not the CoordiFit group (F(1,8)=7.977, P = .022).
conclusionWhile the results show a promising decrease in cancer-related fatigue in response to ERYT, this held true also for the movement-based control intervention, suggesting ERYT to be valuable, but not superior to other movement-based approaches for cancer-related fatigue. However, the small sample size limits the conclusions that can be drawn. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: #NCT04024267.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.