ArticleJournal of vision2025
The effects of aging on directionally selective masking.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motion perception is degraded in older adults. Previous studies suggest that this effect of aging may be due in part to an increase in the bandwidth of directionally selective mechanisms. We tested this idea by measuring directional masking in younger and older adults. Experiments 1-3 measured the contrast needed to discriminate the direction of coherently moving signal dots embedded in high-contrast mask dots. The distribution of mask dot directions was varied with notch filters, and directional selectivity was indexed by the slope of the threshold-versus-notch function. Thresholds were higher and directional selectivity of masking was lower in older compared to younger adults. However, age differences were eliminated when signal and mask contrast were expressed as multiples of discrimination thresholds for unmasked motion. Experiments 4-5 measured direction discrimination thresholds by varying the proportion of coherently moving dots embedded in a mask consisting of dots whose directions varied across conditions. All dots were high contrast, so age differences in masking are unlikely to be caused by differences in contrast sensitivity in these conditions. Nevertheless, Experiments 4-5 also found higher discrimination thresholds and reduced directional selectivity in older adults. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that directionally selective mechanisms become more broadly tuned during senescence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.