ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab in treatment-naïve metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients: An Austrian real-world analysis.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toxicity attribution during enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab therapy in urothelial carcinoma: a practical framework.The oncologist · 2026Review
- Effectiveness and safety of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in a real-world patient population with urothelial carcinoma: results from a multi-institutional cohort (GUARDIANS).Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Article
- Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab in treatment-naïve metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients: An Austrian real-world analysis.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Oncologic outcome and safety profile of first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab vs. conventional chemotherapy in advanced urothelial cancer.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and immunotherapy have changed the treatment landscape for locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). Clinical trials have demonstrated the superiority of enfortumab vedotin (EV) combined with pembrolizumab (P) over chemotherapy. This retrospective, multicentre Austrian registry analysis evaluated the effectiveness and safety of EV + P in treatment-naïve la/mUC patients in a real-world setting. This study included 203 first-line EV + P treated patients from 20 Austrian centres. The majority were male (77.3%), with a median age of 70 years (range, 26-92), while 33.5% were ≥75 years. Comorbidities were common, with 25.1% having a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 5, and 46.3% moderate to severe renal impairment. Among 195 evaluable patients, the objective response rate (ORR) was 63.6% (95% CI, 56.6-70.0), including 21.5% complete responses and 42.1% partial responses. Disease control was achieved in 75.4% (95% CI, 68.9-80.9). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached after a median follow-up of 5.8 months. Poor outcomes were associated with ECOG PS >2 (PFS, p = .003; OS, p< .001) and CCI ≥5 (PFS, p = .011; OS, p = .08). EV + P was generally well tolerated; grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 38.4% of patients and immune-related adverse events in 19.2%. Limitations of this study include its retrospective design and short follow-up. These findings support the clinical use of EV + P as first-line treatment for la/mUC, demonstrating substantial effectiveness and manageable toxicity in a large real-world population, including elderly and comorbid patients. Extended follow-up is warranted to determine long-term survival and predictive markers of response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.