Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41123038›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026

Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab in treatment-naïve metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients: An Austrian real-world analysis.

Dora Niedersuess-Beke, Karl Mayrhofer, Johanna Krauter, Johannes Franke, Dominic Vais, Maximillian Pallauf, David Kiesl, Ferdinand Luger, Jacob Pfuner, Angelika Terbuch and 21 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Dora Niedersuess-BekeDepartment of Internal Medicine I., Centre for Oncology and Haematology, Vienna Healthcare Group, Ottakring, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0544-5773
Karl MayrhoferDepartment of Internal Medicine I., Centre for Oncology and Haematology, Vienna Healthcare Group, Ottakring, Vienna, Austria.
Johanna KrauterDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Johannes FrankeDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Dominic VaisDepartment of Internal Medicine Oncology and Haematology, State Hospital Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria.
Maximillian PallaufDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
David KieslDepartment of Internal Medicine I with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Linz, Austria and Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Ferdinand LugerDepartment of Urology, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Linz, Austria.
Jacob PfunerDepartment of Urology, Klinikum Donaustadt, Vienna, Austria.
Angelika TerbuchDivision of Clinical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Thomas BauernhoferDivision of Clinical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Jasmin SpielgelbergDepartment of Oncology, Hematology and Palliative Medicine, Klinikum Oberwart, Oberwart, Austria.
Andreas BannerDepartment of Urology, Vienna Healthcare Group, Favoriten, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan AufderklammDepartment of Urology, State Hospital Bregenz, Bregenz, Austria.
Clemens WiesingerDepartment of Urology, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria.
Susanne SchnabelDepartment of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Centre, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Simon Peter GampenriederDepartment of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Centre, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3966-1071
Josef MühlmannDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. John of God Hospital, Salzburg, Austria.
Sonia ValletDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Krems and Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Austria.
Sabine WeibrechtDepartment of Internal Medicine II, St. John of God Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Franz StoiberDepartment of Urology, State Hospital Salzkammergut, Vöcklabruck, Austria.
Haleh AndalibiDepartment of Internal Medicine Oncology and Haematology, Barmherzige Schwestern, Vienna, Austria.
Harun FajkovicDepartment of Urology and Andrology, University Hospital St. Pölten, St. Pölten, Austria.
Hossein TaghizadehDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital St. Pölten, St. Pölten, Austria.
Jan MiechowieckiDepartment of Haematology and Oncology, Hanusch Krankenhaus of the OEGK, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Roman TaedckeDepartment of Internal Medicine I., Centre for Oncology and Haematology, Vienna Healthcare Group, Ottakring, Vienna, Austria.
Daniel HeintelDepartment for Oncology, Karl Landsteiner Institute for Bioanalytical Oncology, Horn, Austria.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin PichlerDepartment of Internal Medicine Oncology and Haematology, Klinik Oberwart, Oberwart, Austria.
Wolfgang HilbeDepartment of Internal Medicine I., Centre for Oncology and Haematology, Vienna Healthcare Group, Ottakring, Vienna, Austria.
Renate PichlerDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre Innsbruck, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5286-9048

Funding

Astellas Pharma GmbH EV-000019810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and immunotherapy have changed the treatment landscape for locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). Clinical trials have demonstrated the superiority of enfortumab vedotin (EV) combined with pembrolizumab (P) over chemotherapy. This retrospective, multicentre Austrian registry analysis evaluated the effectiveness and safety of EV + P in treatment-naïve la/mUC patients in a real-world setting. This study included 203 first-line EV + P treated patients from 20 Austrian centres. The majority were male (77.3%), with a median age of 70 years (range, 26-92), while 33.5% were ≥75 years. Comorbidities were common, with 25.1% having a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 5, and 46.3% moderate to severe renal impairment. Among 195 evaluable patients, the objective response rate (ORR) was 63.6% (95% CI, 56.6-70.0), including 21.5% complete responses and 42.1% partial responses. Disease control was achieved in 75.4% (95% CI, 68.9-80.9). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached after a median follow-up of 5.8 months. Poor outcomes were associated with ECOG PS >2 (PFS, p = .003; OS, p< .001) and CCI ≥5 (PFS, p = .011; OS, p = .08). EV + P was generally well tolerated; grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 38.4% of patients and immune-related adverse events in 19.2%. Limitations of this study include its retrospective design and short follow-up. These findings support the clinical use of EV + P as first-line treatment for la/mUC, demonstrating substantial effectiveness and manageable toxicity in a large real-world population, including elderly and comorbid patients. Extended follow-up is warranted to determine long-term survival and predictive markers of response.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustriaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedenfortumab vedotinpembrolizumabenfortumab vedotinmetastatic urothelial carcinomapembrolizumabreal‐world evidenceregistry

Identifiers

PMID41123038
PMCPMC12811209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.