ReviewNeurourology and urodynamics2026
Phenotyping Overactive Bladder - Part 2: Can Management be Improved by Phenotyping, and Targeting Therapy According to Urgency Type and Other Characteristics? ICI-RS 2025.
Review in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionManagement of overactive bladder (OAB) has a stepwise approach in adults and children. This does not account for individual patient variations, which may explain suboptimal outcomes in many patients. Distinct OAB profiles, based on patient characteristics, symptoms, urodynamic findings and imaging have been discussed in Part 1. Personalized treatment and escalation pathways based on OAB profiling may lead to faster OAB symptom control and quality of life improvement, reduced cumulative side effects and costs, and improved treatment adherence.
methodsA Think Tank at the International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society (ICI-RS) 2025 discussed the question, "Can OAB management be improved by phenotyping, and targeting therapy according to urgency type and other characteristics?" The group discussed the current literature on this topic and developed a list of research questions and strategies to help shape the future of the field.
resultsTailored combination of antimuscarinics and/or beta3 agonists, with botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) and/or sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) was considered a high priority research topic. Profile-based individual treatment selection and delivery protocols for BTX-A and SNS are potential means to improve outcomes, as is the early escalation to BTX-A and SNS in the treatment pathway of both adults and children. Finally, phenotype-based treatment requires tight treatment outcome follow-up and possible adjustment (including re-phenotyping) for which tools need to be developed.
conclusionDevelopment and validation of a patient-based flow-chart to replace the current stepwise approach in OAB management will allow tailored treatment, aimed to improve therapeutic success, and to reduce side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.