ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2025
Rapid Diagnostic Model for Critical Illness Polyneuropathy Based on Electrophysiological Data.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurological Complications in Intensive Care Units: From Delirium to Long-Term Cognitive Dysfunction-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Rapid Diagnostic Model for Critical Illness Polyneuropathy Based on Electrophysiological Data.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCritical illness polyneuropathy (CIP) is a common cause of weakness in critically ill patients, and early diagnosis and treatment are essential. Conventional comprehensive electrophysiological testing requires 60-90 min and can be invasive, limiting its utility in the intensive care setting. This study aimed to develop a rapid, efficient, and minimally invasive diagnostic model for CIP.
methodsPatients who met the inclusion criteria were recruited from the intensive care units (ICU) of the First Medical Center and Fifth Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital and Nanfang Hospital. To identify the optimal diagnostic model, we compared several machine learning approaches, including K-nearest neighbor, support vector machine with radial basis function (SVM-RBF), SVM with Gaussian kernel, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGB), using all electrophysiological features. These were also compared with nerve conduction studies of the peroneal and sural nerves. To construct a rapid diagnostic model, different feature combinations were assessed across the machine learning methods. Model performance was evaluated using cross-validated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs).
resultsOf 14,768 admissions screened, 134 patients with CIP and 135 matched controls were included. In total, 41 electrophysiological features were analyzed. Feature ranking revealed that the distal compound muscle action potential (CMAP) of the peroneal nerve contributed most to diagnostic accuracy. After comparison, the SVM-RBF method was selected to establish the final diagnostic model. The optimal model, based on seven electrophysiological features of the peroneal and ulnar nerves (proximal latency, distal latency, and CMAP amplitude), achieved an AUC of 0.93, which was comparable to the all-feature XGB model (AUC = 0.95). In the independent validation set, the rapid diagnostic model maintained strong performance (AUC = 0.88), similar to the all-feature model (AUC = 0.90).
conclusionWe developed a rapid diagnostic model for CIP using the SVM-RBF method and seven electrophysiological features from the peroneal and ulnar nerves. This model enables efficient, minimally invasive, and timely diagnosis of CIP in critically ill patients. The source code and related scripts are available at [https://github.com/PLAGH-Neuro-Yang/RDM-CIP].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.