Observational studyEuropean journal of haematology2026
Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Damoctocog Alfa Pegol in Severe and Nonsevere Patients With Hemophilia A From the Prospective, Multinational, Ongoing HEM-POWR Study.
Observational study in European journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03932201 (Observational Study Evaluating Effectiveness and Safety of Real-World Treatment With Damoctocog Alfa Pegol in Previously Treated Patients With Hemophilia A), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Observational Study Evaluating Effectiveness and Safety of Real-World Treatment With Damoctocog Alfa Pegol in Previously Treated Patients With Hemophilia A
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Damoctocog Alfa Pegol in Severe and Nonsevere Patients With Hemophilia A From the Prospective, Multinational, Ongoing HEM-POWR Study.European journal of haematology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of damoctocog alfa pegol in patients with severe and nonsevere hemophilia A in the fifth interim analysis of the ongoing HEM-POWR study.
methodsHEM-POWR (NCT03932201) is a multinational, Phase 4, prospective observational study. The key objectives were the annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and adverse events.
resultsAt data cutoff (July 8, 2024), the safety analysis set and full analysis set (FAS) included 370 and 270 patients, respectively. In the modified FAS (patients with ≥ 90 days of bleed data), the mean (standard deviation; SD) ABR for total bleeds was 2.8 (5.9) 12 months prior to damoctocog alfa pegol initiation with the previous FVIII product and 2.1 (4.8) during the observation period. Bleed protection with damoctocog alfa pegol was maintained across disease severity, age group, BMI group, dosing regimen, and patient inhibitor history. One patient died due to spinal cord ischemia unrelated to the study drug. One patient developed a transient low-titer inhibitor, which resolved without clinical consequence.
conclusionsThis updated analysis further demonstrated the effectiveness, acceptable safety profile, and tolerability of damoctocog alfa pegol for previously treated patients with severe and nonsevere hemophilia A from adolescence to older age in a real-world setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.