ArticleOpen biology2025
Keratinocyte self-renewal and differentiation is dictated by extrinsic signals from dermal extracellular matrices.
Article in Open biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fetal skin has an intrinsic regenerative capability to restore an injured site's architecture and functionality. This is preserved until the third trimester, when wound healing transitions to a scarring reparative response. This change coincides with the dynamic remodelling of dermal extracellular matrix (ECM). Here, we used primary human fetal or adult dermal fibroblast (fHDF and aHDF)-derived ECMs to demonstrate that different extrinsic signals from these ECMs dramatically altered gene expression in a primary human keratinocyte population grown on these matrices. Gene array data revealed keratinocytes grown on fHDF ECM markedly upregulated expression of cell-cycle genes, whereas on aHDF ECM expression of differentiation genes was favoured. Detailed proteomic analyses indicated compositionally distinct ECMs were deposited by aHDFs and fHDFs. Moreover, aHDFs and fHDFs contained subpopulation(s) that differentially expressed CD90, CD146 and CD26. On fHDFs the extracellular domain of CD26 was shed whereas on aHDFs full-length CD26 dominated. The proteomic and gene array data supported the fine-tuning of BMP/TGFβ/SMAD signalling pathways being a mechanism by which fetal matrices promote keratinocyte self-renewal. Collectively, these findings revealed that a fundamental aspect of skin development is dictated by the ECM of the dermis, specifically extrinsic signals from dermal fibroblast ECM direct keratinocyte self-renewal or differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.