ArticleJCI insight2025
Lower, more frequent cisplatin dosing minimizes hearing loss in head and neck cancer.
Article in JCI insight, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-Dependent Patterns of Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity in Head and Neck Cancer: A Longitudinal Audiologic Analysis.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Audiological and Vestibular Follow-up in Adult Cancer Patients Receiving Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Article
- Progressive Sensorineural Hearing Loss Following Cisplatin Chemotherapy: Mechanisms Underlying Cochlear Retention and Long-Term Ototoxicity.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Potential Mechanisms of MAP Kinase JNK's Involvement in Modulating Cancer Cell Fate in a Cisplatin Concentration-Dependent Manner.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUNDCisplatin is often the cytotoxic drug of choice for chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but it can lead to irreversible hearing loss. There may be similar oncologic outcomes but different toxicity profiles depending on whether cisplatin is given at 75-100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or 30-40 mg/mg2 weekly. This study compares cisplatin-induced hearing loss in patients with HNSCC receiving similar cumulative doses of cisplatin administered either on higher-dose or lower-dose treatment schedules.METHODSUsing the Enhancing Cancer Hearing Outcomes (ECHO) dataset from 5 academic centers, we conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18 years) with HNSCC receiving cisplatin-based CRT. Participants were grouped by cisplatin dose schedule: every 3 weeks (≥75 mg/m²) or weekly (<75 mg/m²). Hearing loss was assessed using American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 threshold shift criteria based on audiograms obtained ≤120 days before and after treatment. Risk differences and predictors of hearing loss were evaluated using χ2 analyses and multivariate regression. Kaplan-Meier curves assessed overall and disease-free survival.RESULTSAmong 564 participants (1,127 ears), lower-dose weekly cisplatin was associated with significantly lower incidence of hearing loss (ASHA criteria: 57% vs. 82%; CTCAE criteria: 39% vs. 69%). CTCAE grade ≥2 hearing loss occurred in 18% of the weekly group versus 50% of the 3-week group. Multivariate analysis confirmed treatment schedule as an independent predictor of ototoxicity. Two-year survival outcomes did not differ between groups.CONCLUSIONSWeekly low-dose cisplatin significantly reduced the incidence and severity of hearing loss without compromising survival, supporting its broader use in CRT for HNSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.