Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41122932›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2025

The Guidance of Attentional Selectivity in Visual Search Is Always Feature-Based: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence From Feature and Conjunction Search Tasks.

Ziyi Wang, Mikel Jimenez, Martin Eimer, Anna Grubert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ziyi WangDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Mikel JimenezDepartamento de Psicología Básica I, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain.
Martin EimerDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
Anna GrubertDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3601-7317

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/V002708/1Leverhulme Trust RPG-2020-319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is generally assumed that the guidance of attention in visual search operates in a feature-based fashion, but this conclusion is mainly based on the results of search tasks with feature-defined targets. Here, we investigated whether attentional templates may contain integrated object-based representations in tasks where targets are defined by feature conjunctions. Attentional load was manipulated by instructing participants to search for a single or one of two different possible targets. Search targets were either defined by a particular color or shape (feature search tasks) or by a color/shape combination (conjunction search task), and load effects were compared between these two types of tasks. Load effects on search performance as well as on electrophysiological markers of attentional guidance (N2pc components) and the number of attentional templates activated in working memory (CDA components) were much more pronounced during conjunction search. This suggests that attentional templates are always feature-based, even when object-based templates are in principle available to reduce memory load.

Indexed as

AttentionVisual PerceptionAdultElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41122932
PMCPMC12541687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.