GuidelineCirculation2025
Part 3: Ethics: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.
Guideline in Circulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Part 4: Systems of Care: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.Circulation · 2025Guideline
- [Visceral surgery in mass casualty incidents due to disasters, crises and war].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Organ donation after ECPR: ethical challenges and clinical implications.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Dispatcher-led triage to reduce futile EMS transport for suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan: a narrative review and phased implementation framework.Resuscitation plus · 2026Review
- Extracorporeal Life Support in Severe Accidental Hypothermia: Mechanisms, Challenges and Clinical Horizons.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A content and quality analysis on open online platform videos on do not resuscitate (DNR).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bridging the gap: beyond "overreach" in ECPR rewarming for hypothermic cardiac arrest in older patients.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Violations of the Shortest Distance-Based Transport Protocol for Intra-Arrest on Clinical Outcomes in a Metropolitan City: A Large-Scale Registry Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Knowledge and Willingness to Perform Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation by Bystanders in Jordan; A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this chapter, the American Heart Association provides guidance on ethical considerations relevant to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. An overview is provided of ethical frameworks that provide a structure through which difficult decisions can be analyzed. These include principlism, currently the predominant medical ethical framework, which considers moral principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice. Additional consideration is given to the value of dignity, and other ethical frameworks such as narrative ethics, crisis standards of care, utilitarianism, virtue ethics, and deontology. The importance of equity and the imperative for health care professionals and their organizations to actively address structural inequities, social determinants of health and resulting disparities related to Emergency Cardiovascular Care is highlighted. Processes for decision-making are discussed, including guidance on advance directives and shared decision-making. Decisions to initiate or withhold and subsequently to continue or terminate resuscitation are reviewed at length. In addition to considering this decision in adults and geriatric patients, specific attention is given to decision-making in children, newborn infants, and pregnant patients. The impact of prognostic uncertainty on these decisions is discussed, as well as the evaluation of potentially ineffective therapies and cultural and religious considerations. Other ethical topics are addressed briefly, including processes for research and knowledge generation; the impact of resuscitation on health care professionals, survivors, laypersons, families, and caregivers; family presence during resuscitation; crisis standards of care; advanced therapies, including extracorporeal support; and organ and tissue donation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.