Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41122890›Full record

GuidelineCirculation2025

Part 3: Ethics: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Jonathan Elmer, Dianne L Atkins, Mohamud R Daya, Marina Del Rios, Jessica T Fry, Carrie M Henderson, Mithya Lewis-Newby, Vanessa N Madrigal, Catherine A Marco, Joseph P Ornato and 8 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Circulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Bridging the gap: beyond "overreach" in ECPR rewarming for hypothermic cardiac arrest in older patients.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jonathan Elmer
Dianne L Atkins
Mohamud R Daya
Marina Del Rios
Jessica T Fry
Carrie M Henderson
Mithya Lewis-Newby
Vanessa N Madrigal
Catherine A Marco
Joseph P Ornato
Erin T Paquette
Sam Parnia
Amber J Rodriguez
Joseph P Shapiro
Stephen M Schexnayder
Elliott M Weiss
David M Zientek
Ahamed H Idris

Funding

ADaPT to Engage: Assessing for Disparities and Potential Targets for Intervention to Engage Acutely Ill Children in ResearchK23HD098289 · NICHD · LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO · PI PAQUETTE, ERIN D · 2020 to 2024
$722k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD098289NICHD NIH HHS L40 HD089260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this chapter, the American Heart Association provides guidance on ethical considerations relevant to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. An overview is provided of ethical frameworks that provide a structure through which difficult decisions can be analyzed. These include principlism, currently the predominant medical ethical framework, which considers moral principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice. Additional consideration is given to the value of dignity, and other ethical frameworks such as narrative ethics, crisis standards of care, utilitarianism, virtue ethics, and deontology. The importance of equity and the imperative for health care professionals and their organizations to actively address structural inequities, social determinants of health and resulting disparities related to Emergency Cardiovascular Care is highlighted. Processes for decision-making are discussed, including guidance on advance directives and shared decision-making. Decisions to initiate or withhold and subsequently to continue or terminate resuscitation are reviewed at length. In addition to considering this decision in adults and geriatric patients, specific attention is given to decision-making in children, newborn infants, and pregnant patients. The impact of prognostic uncertainty on these decisions is discussed, as well as the evaluation of potentially ineffective therapies and cultural and religious considerations. Other ethical topics are addressed briefly, including processes for research and knowledge generation; the impact of resuscitation on health care professionals, survivors, laypersons, families, and caregivers; family presence during resuscitation; crisis standards of care; advanced therapies, including extracorporeal support; and organ and tissue donation.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationEmergency Medical ServicesAmerican Heart AssociationClinical Decision-MakingHumansReview Literature as TopicUnited StatesAHA Scientific Statementscardiopulmonary resuscitationdecision-makingdelivery of health careethicsheart arrestlife support careproblem solving

Identifiers

PMID41122890
PMCPMC13600561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.