Trial reportCirculation2025
Heart Stress and Blood Pressure Management in Older Adults: Post Hoc Analysis of the ASPREE Trial.
Trial report in Circulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Clinical Prediction Model for Selective NT-proBNP Testing in Hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Article
- Natriuretic peptides and cardiac troponins in hypertension and heart failure: A contemporary review of the evidence.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Review
- Heart Stress, Frailty and Mortality Risk in two prospective cohorts.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBlood pressure (BP) management in older adults is complex because of age-related physiological changes and uncertainty around ideal systolic BP (SBP) targets. Heart stress (HS), defined by age-adjusted elevation in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels, may improve cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification and support more individualized BP management.
methodsWe conducted a post hoc analysis of ASPREE (Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly) involving 11 941 community-dwelling older adults without CVD at enrollment (mean age, 75.1 years; 53.5% women). HS was defined by NT-proBNP ≥150 pg/mL for participants 65 to 74 years of age and ≥300 pg/mL for participants ≥75 years of age. Participants were categorized into 4 groups by hypertension and HS status. The primary outcome was total CVD events (a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal or nonfatal stroke, coronary heart disease death, or hospitalization for heart failure). Associations between hypertension and SBP with total CVD events were examined by HS status using Cox proportional-hazards models and restricted cubic spline. SBP was evaluated categorically (<120, 120-129, 130-139, 140-159, or ≥160 mm Hg) and continuously. A landmark sensitivity analysis excluded participants with CVD events or censoring in the first 2 years, with follow-up starting at year 3.
resultsHS was present in 25.8% of participants. Compared with the reference group (no hypertension or HS), adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) for total CVD events were 1.41 (1.18-1.70) for hypertension + no HS, 1.79 (1.34-2.39) for no hypertension + HS, and 2.32 (1.89-2.84) for hypertension + HS (
conclusionsHS is common in older adults and jointly associated with hypertension and increased CVD risk. The SBP-CVD relationship differs by HS status, suggesting a potential value of HS for guiding individualized BP management. Prospective studies are warranted to determine whether HS-guided strategies improve BP control and reduce CVD risk in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.