ReviewJournal of internal medicine2025
Ignoring the planet: A critical blind spot for research on ageing.
Review in Journal of internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative physiology and biomimetics in metabolic and environmental health: what can we learn from extreme animal phenotypes?Diabetologia · 2026Review
- Ignoring the planet: A critical blind spot for research on ageing.Journal of internal medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although research on ageing has largely concentrated on understanding the fundamental biology of the ageing process and devising pharmaceutical interventions in order to slow it down, increasing evidence has underscored the crucial role of environmental inputs across the life course and across generations, in shaping both individual and intergenerational trajectories of age-related health. These include nutrition, air pollution, social deprivation, lifestyle factors, climate change and exposure to environmental toxins, including microplastics and nanoplastics. The development of the concept of the exposome of ageing and the emergence of the new field of 'exposomics' have identified a blind spot, in particular, for geroscience. The impact of the exposome affecting human 'healthspan' (i.e., years lived in good health), extending across generations, is significant and yet under-explored in research. As such, it is under-appreciated that the declining health of the planet will have intergenerational ripple effects, epigenetically priming adverse health in future generations. We discuss the capacity to manipulate our exposome to mitigate against such effects, by addressing root causes, rather than symptoms, of both physiological and planetary dysregulation, dysfunction and decay. We propose a systems-based framework that reconnects research on ageing with exposomics and planetary ecology, creating a new field of 'ecological or exposome pharmacology', harnessing the activity of Nrf2 as a senotherapeutic intervention to improve trans- and intergenerational physiology in the face of declining planetary health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.